Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/protomated/protomated-plugins-official/contract-reviewnpx skills add protomated/protomated-plugins-official --skill contract-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/protomated/protomated-plugins-officialWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/protomated/protomated-plugins-official/contract-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/protomated/protomated-plugins-official/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/protomated/protomated-plugins-official/contract-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01954 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00977 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00391 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
contract-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/contract-review — Contract & Document Review
⚠️ AI-ASSISTED DRAFT — ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED BEFORE USE Reviewed against the playbook you provided. Does not determine whether to sign, negotiate, or reject this contract, and does not verify enforceability under governing law. No tracked changes are applied to your document — copy any suggested redline into your own file yourself. Not legal advice.
This skill reviews an attached contract clause by clause against a playbook — your firm's own playbook.md if you've attached one, or this plugin's bundled generic playbook (playbooks/generic-playbook.md) if you haven't.
This skill reviews from what you provide. It never invents contract language that isn't in the attached contract, and it never invents a firm position that isn't encoded in the playbook it's using. It never decides whether you or your client should sign, walk away from, or accept the contract, never determines a clause's enforceability under governing law, and never sends, files, or executes anything. A clause type the playbook doesn't cover is left UNRATED — never guessed.
Invocation
/contract-review
/contract-review [contract name, if more than one is attached]
Workflow
Step 1 — Collect inputs
The contract — read from the attached workspace folder if one is attached, or from text pasted directly into the conversation. If nothing is attached or pasted, ask the attorney to attach the contract or paste its text.
If more than one contract is attached: ask which one to review, or whether to review all of them, before starting.
The playbook — look in the attached folder for the firm's own playbook.md:
- If found, use it — apply its clause entries exactly as written, including its own fallback ranges and red-flag triggers.
- If not found, use this plugin's bundled generic playbook (
playbooks/generic-playbook.md) instead, and say so plainly when you present the review: it's a conservative, general-purpose starting point, not this firm's actual negotiation positions, and every rating from it is a starting point the attorney must confirm. This is the documented fallback, not a refusal — do not stop and ask for a playbook before proceeding.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 140 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 423cce2dfa17
contract-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository protomated/protomated-plugins-official (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,954 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
Write the full patent specification from claims and invention disclosure. Use when user says "撰写说明书", "write specification", "写说明书", "patent description", or wants to draft the complete patent specification.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…