lint

lint is a skill for Claude Code from protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin. It costs 50 tokens per session (1,258 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A health-check tool for a markdown vault, meaning a folder of linked Markdown notes. It can check note style, vault health, hierarchy and numbering, or the overall structure.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for running Markdown style checks, auditing a note vault, checking hierarchy and numbering, and comparing the declared structure with the files on disk.
Why use it?
It finds structural, formatting, and organisation problems that are easy to miss when maintaining many notes. The available checks also cover links, orphaned notes, metadata, and contradictions.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents.

Part of the axiomcore plugin — 8 skills, 3 agents shipped together

Good fit It is for running Markdown style checks, auditing a note vault, checking hierarchy and numbering, and comparing the declared structure with the files on disk.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin/lint
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin --skill lint
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install axiomcore, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 8 skills, 3 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for lint

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin/lint/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin/lint)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin/lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for lint

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin/lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 50 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,258 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00050 $0.01258
Opus 5 $0.00025 $0.00629
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00252
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00126

Measured 9d ago against content hash d0a948549d2f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/lint/SKILL.md · 74 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Task

Execute the requested action: $ARGUMENTS

Calling rule: /lint <action>.

If the requested action is ambiguous or contradictory, do NOT guess: flag it and ask for clarification before executing.


If action is empty

Describe this skill: its purpose and the actions table from "overview". Do not execute anything.

If action is "overview" (or unknown)

Argument Action
all Markdown style check + vault health check + structure check
markdown markdownlint across all .md files, auto-fix what is safe
vault Full vault audit via the vault-gardener agent: freshness, links, orphans, index, structure mirror, frontmatter, contradictions
structure Hierarchy: declared depth vs actual nesting, numbering, registry vs filesystem, naming convention
overview This table

If the action was unknown, say so first, then show the table.


If action is "markdown" (also part of "all")

  1. Run npx --yes markdownlint-cli2 --fix "**/*.md" from the workspace root (config: .markdownlint.json, shipped with the workspace; if it is missing, create it with defaults and MD013 disabled).
  2. Report anything not auto-fixed and fix those manually.

If action is "vault" (also part of "all")

  1. Delegate to the vault-gardener subagent. It owns the check list, the severity report, and the safe-fix rules.
  2. Relay its report to the user unchanged.
  3. For every "Needs your decision" item the user approves, apply the proposed fix, then re-run the affected check to confirm.

If action is "structure" (also part of "all")

Checks the hierarchy rules of root CLAUDE.md (Hierarchy Protocol, Output Hygiene & Naming, Task ID Protocol) against what is actually on disk. Registries are the source of truth: vault/projects/<project>/ids.md for projects, vault/workstations/<workstation>/areas.md for workstations.

  1. Depth declared. Every project and workstation must carry a Levels: **2** or Levels: **3** line in its registry. Missing → report it; do not guess the depth from the folders.
  2. Depth respected.
    • 2-level: no sub-unit folders at all; every WP/WA sits directly under the project or workstation.
    • 3-level: no WP/WA directly under the project or workstation; every one of them sits inside a numbered sub-unit. A violation is never auto-fixed — moving a WP renumbers it and rewrites task IDs, which is a /setup migration. Report and stop there.
  3. Numbering. Every sub-unit, WP and WA folder carries a zero-padded numeric prefix. Numbers are unique within their parent — duplicates inside one sub-project are an error; the same number reused across two sub-projects is correct and expected at 3 levels.
  4. Naming convention. Every generated folder and file name is Latin-alphabet kebab-case (fixed-name and prefix exceptions per root CLAUDE.md). Report violations; renaming is a user decision.
  5. Registry vs filesystem. Every registry row has a matching folder and every folder a matching row, in both the working tree and the vault mirror. Each counter must exceed the highest number actually used — a counter that has fallen behind will hand out a duplicate on the next allocation.
  6. Mirror symmetry. For every WP and WA, the vault path matches the working-tree path exactly, acronym and number prefixes included.
  7. Task IDs match location. In each WP's tasks.md, every task ID's prefix must equal that WP's own numbers (XX-WW at 2 levels, XX-SS-WW at 3) and its part count must match the project's declared depth. Report mismatches; renumbering is a migration, not a lint fix.
  8. Work only in WP/WA. No resources/ or outputs/ folder anywhere except inside a WP or a work area.
  9. Produced filenames. Every file you produced inside a WP or work area matches <acr>-<address>-<NNN>-<name>.<ext>, with <acr> and <address> equal to the unit it sits in — a file carrying another unit's address is in the wrong folder. Setup files match su-<NNN>-<name>.md. Report: numbers duplicated within a unit (legitimate only for one document exported in several formats, same name part), a Next output / Next setup counter at or below the highest number in use, leftover date or version strings in a filename, and markdown deliverables missing the header block or the ## Changelog section. Feature documents (<acr>-<address>-f###-<slug>.md) are exempt from the number, the header and the changelog. User uploads are never checked — only files you produced; when authorship is unclear, report nothing.

Read the full file on GitHub · 74 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 74 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A d0a948549d2f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

lint is a skill published in the GitHub repository protonium-labs/axiomcore-plugin (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,258 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

operating-cadence

Designs the rhythm an organization runs on — which reviews happen weekly, monthly and quarterly, what each one decides, who owns the numbers presented, and how a signal at the front line reaches the people who can act on it. Use this to set up a management operating system, fix a meeting calendar that produces no…

cbrock84/headcount · 95 tokens

analyze

Deep-dive codebase analysis that explains how things actually work — business rules, architecture patterns, auth flows, data models, integrations, and performance hotspots. Use whenever the user asks "how does X work", "map the Y flow", "what are the business rules for Z", "trace the auth path", "explore the codebase…

rsmdt/the-startup · 118 tokens

debug

Systematically diagnose and resolve bugs through conversational investigation and root cause analysis.

rsmdt/the-startup · 15 tokens

testing

Writing effective tests and running them successfully. Covers layer-specific mocking rules, test design principles, debugging failures, and flaky test management. Use when writing tests, reviewing test quality, or debugging test failures.

rsmdt/the-startup · 42 tokens

performance-analysis

Measurement approaches, profiling patterns, bottleneck identification, and optimization guidance. Use when diagnosing performance issues, establishing baselines, identifying bottlenecks, or planning for scale. Always measure before optimizing.

rsmdt/the-startup · 42 tokens

markifact-overview

Reference — what Markifact is, what the MCP server exposes, and the discover→inspect→run pattern. Always loaded into the performance-marketer agent.

markifact/markifact-mcp · 36 tokens