Prowler is an open-source cloud security platform that checks cloud environments for security issues and compliance with standards such as CIS, NIST, and GDPR. Security teams use it to assess configurations, prioritize findings, produce reports, and guide remediation.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add prowler-cloud/prowler --skill prowler-sdk-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prowler-cloud/prowlerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-sdk-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-sdk-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-sdk-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-sdk-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/prowler-cloud/prowler/prowler-sdk-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.02257 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01128 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00451 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00226 |
Grade A, and why
prowler-sdk-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 280 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Check Structure
prowler/providers/{provider}/services/{service}/{check_name}/
├── __init__.py
├── {check_name}.py
└── {check_name}.metadata.json
Step-by-Step Creation Process
1. Prerequisites
- Verify check doesn't exist: Search
prowler/providers/{provider}/services/{service}/ - Ensure provider and service exist - create them first if not
- Confirm service has required methods - may need to add/modify service methods to get data
2. Create Check Files
mkdir -p prowler/providers/{provider}/services/{service}/{check_name}
touch prowler/providers/{provider}/services/{service}/{check_name}/__init__.py
touch prowler/providers/{provider}/services/{service}/{check_name}/{check_name}.py
touch prowler/providers/{provider}/services/{service}/{check_name}/{check_name}.metadata.json
3. Implement Check Logic
from prowler.lib.check.models import Check, Check_Report_{Provider}
from prowler.providers.{provider}.services.{service}.{service}_client import {service}_client
class {check_name}(Check):
"""Ensure that {resource} meets {security_requirement}."""
def execute(self) -> list[Check_Report_{Provider}]:
"""Execute the check logic.
Returns:
A list of reports containing the result of the check.
"""
findings = []
for resource in {service}_client.{resources}:
report = Check_Report_{Provider}(metadata=self.metadata(), resource=resource)
report.status = "PASS" if resource.is_compliant else "FAIL"
report.status_extended = f"Resource {resource.name} compliance status."
findings.append(report)
return findings
4. Create Metadata File
See complete schema below and assets/ folder for complete templates.
For detailed field documentation, see references/metadata-docs.md.
5. Verify Check Detection
uv run python prowler-cli.py {provider} --list-checks | grep {check_name}
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +18 lines e3232b14b416
- 9d ago First seen · 262 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 2e46d27a1b43
prowler-sdk-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository prowler-cloud/prowler (14,767 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 2,257 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
performing-aws-account-enumeration-with-scout-suite
Perform comprehensive security posture assessment of AWS accounts using ScoutSuite to enumerate resources, identify misconfigurations, and generate actionable security reports.
cis-aws-database-3.11
Ensure to Regularly Review Security Configuration.
ponytail-sec-audit
Full project security audit. Scans the entire codebase across three passes: code that shouldn't exist, all dependencies assessed, all hardening findings. Produces a comprehensive numbered report with blast-radius narrative. Persists findings to .ponytail-sec/ for cross-scan tracking. For per-diff review use…
ponytail-sec
Security companion for active development. Scopes to the current diff or changed files. Three passes: YAGNI code review, new-dep assessment, and up to 3 material hardening findings. Lean by design — surfaces the one thing to fix before merging, not a backlog. Use ponytail-sec-audit for a full project scan.
k8s-securitycontext
Binary Kubernetes securityContext hardening check. Use when reviewing Pods, Deployments, StatefulSets, DaemonSets, Jobs, CronJobs, Helm templates, or Kubernetes manifests that define containers. Minimal output only: OK or NOTOK: RULE, RULE.
dockerfile
Binary Dockerfile image-build hardening check. Use when reviewing Dockerfiles, container image builds, multi-stage builds, runtime users, pinned bases, or reproducible dependency installs. Minimal output only: OK or NOTOK: RULE, RULE.