Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add proyecto26/system-design-skills --skill messaging-streaminggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/proyecto26/system-design-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/proyecto26/system-design-skills/messaging-streaming)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proyecto26/system-design-skills/messaging-streaming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proyecto26/system-design-skills/messaging-streaming/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/proyecto26/system-design-skills/messaging-streaming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/proyecto26/system-design-skills/messaging-streaming.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00147 | $0.03206 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.01603 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00641 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00321 |
Grade A, and why
messaging-streaming scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 211 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Messaging & Streaming
Move work off the synchronous request path and decouple producers from consumers, so a slow, spiky, or failure-prone operation doesn't block the caller. Getting this wrong is subtle: a queue silently changes the delivery and ordering guarantees, and under load it can absorb a spike gracefully or become the thing that hides a meltdown until the backlog is unrecoverable.
When to reach for this
A step is too slow to do inline (image transcode, fan-out, third-party call); the
write path is spiky and needs a buffer to smooth bursts (→ back-of-the-envelope
for the spike factor); two services must be decoupled so one can fail or deploy
independently; or many consumers need the same event stream. The async hand-off
buys responsiveness, isolation, and elasticity (scale producers and consumers
separately).
When NOT to
The caller needs the result now to proceed (a synchronous read, a balance check before confirming) — a queue only adds latency and a place for work to get lost. Strong read-after-write within one request. Trivial in-process work that a function call handles. Don't add a broker before a number or a coupling problem justifies it (YAGNI): it's a new stateful system to operate, monitor, and reason about under failure. "We'll need Kafka eventually" is name-dropping, not a requirement.
Clarify first
- Sync or async? Does the caller need the result inline, or is fire-and-react acceptable? This decides whether a queue belongs here at all.
- Delivery guarantee needed — is a dropped message acceptable (at-most-once), or must every message be processed (at-least-once + idempotent consumers)?
- Ordering — must messages be processed in order, globally or per-key (per user, per account)? Global ordering is expensive; per-key usually suffices.
- Throughput and retention — messages/sec at peak, and how long must they be
replayable? (→
back-of-the-envelope.) One-shot work vs. a replayable log. - Consumer count and pattern — one worker pool draining a job, or many independent subscribers each reading every event?
- Failure handling — what happens to a message that keeps failing? Where does it go, and who looks at it?
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 211 lines · 147 tokens per session scan A 082dad312af6
messaging-streaming is a skill published in the GitHub repository proyecto26/system-design-skills (69 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 147 tokens to every session and 3,206 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-engineering
Builds and operates data pipelines — ingestion, transformation, orchestration, quality testing, and reliability of data delivery. Use this to design or debug a pipeline, decide batch versus streaming, add data quality checks, handle late or duplicate data, or work out why a dashboard's numbers changed without anyone…
api-design
Designs interfaces that survive their consumers — resource modeling, errors, versioning, pagination, and compatibility. Use this to design a new API, review one before it ships, decide how to version or deprecate, fix an interface consumers keep misusing, or work out whether a change is breaking.
build-falco-web-app
Build or modify a Falco web application in idiomatic F#, using functional routing, request and response helpers, explicit ASP.NET Core integration, security boundaries, and focused tests.
build-giraffe-web-app
Build or modify a Giraffe web application in idiomatic F#, using composable HttpHandler functions, explicit ASP.NET Core integration, configuration, authentication, and focused endpoint tests.
build-oxpecker-web-app
Build or modify an Oxpecker web application in idiomatic F#, using endpoint routing, functional EndpointHandler and EndpointMiddleware composition, ASP.NET Core metadata, and focused endpoint tests.
swift-openapi-client-workflow
Build, integrate, test, and diagnose Swift OpenAPI Generator clients in Apple-platform apps and Swift packages using OpenAPIURLSession, OpenAPIRuntime, URLSessionTransport, SwiftPM plugins, Apple docs, Dash docsets, and clear handoffs to server-side Swift OpenAPI workflows when the API contract or server transport…