Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to public-ui/kolibri. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/public-ui/kolibri/develop/.claude/skills/issue-bewerten/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/public-ui/kolibriWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/public-ui/kolibri/issue-bewerten)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/public-ui/kolibri/issue-bewerten"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/public-ui/kolibri/issue-bewerten/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/public-ui/kolibri/issue-bewerten"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/public-ui/kolibri/issue-bewerten.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00164 | $0.02842 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00066 | $0.01137 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00568 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00284 |
Grade A, and why
issue-bewerten scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed EUPL-1.2
The repository is licensed EUPL-1.2, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +9 lines 72254601c79c
- 1mo ago First seen · 172 lines · 164 tokens per session scan A 53e646a3f24e
issue-bewerten is a skill published in the GitHub repository public-ui/kolibri (288 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed EUPL-1.2. It adds 164 tokens to every session and 2,842 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
frontend-review
Frontend Code Review (Angular & React): Expert review of frontend code focusing on Angular, React, component architecture, state management, performance, accessibility, and UI patterns. Use whenever the user wants a review of frontend code, component design, state management, or mentions Angular, React, TypeScript…
kb-framework-accessibility
Reference data, not a reviewer. Framework-specific accessibility patterns and fix templates for React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Next.js, and Tailwind CSS.
contributions-hub
GitHub community: discussions, moderation, contributor health, CLAs.
issue-tracker
GitHub issues: find, triage, review and respond, with written reports.
pr-review
Review pull requests: diffs, comments, context and written review docs.
team-manager
GitHub org teams: create, staff, onboard, offboard and audit access.