Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to purupurupu/css-noop-checker. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/purupurupu/css-noop-checker/main/.claude/skills/verify-rule/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/purupurupu/css-noop-checkerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/purupurupu/css-noop-checker/verify-rule)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/purupurupu/css-noop-checker/verify-rule"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/purupurupu/css-noop-checker/verify-rule/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/purupurupu/css-noop-checker/verify-rule"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/purupurupu/css-noop-checker/verify-rule.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02891 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01445 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00578 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00289 |
Grade A, and why
verify-rule scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 245 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Rule
Verify a CSS noop rule's correctness and test consistency by cross-checking rule source, unit tests, test.html cases, and real Chromium computed styles via Playwright.
Correctness Standard
This project is Chromium-behavior-driven. The ground truth is what getComputedStyle() returns in current Chromium, not the CSS spec alone.
- False positives are worse than false negatives. If behavior is conditional, context-sensitive, or unclear in Chromium, the rule should stay silent.
- A property that is partially effective (e.g. one axis of
place-itemsstill matters) is NOT a no-op — do not warn. - If you intentionally keep a known false negative, document the trade-off in the rule comment.
Apply this standard at every judgment point in the workflow below.
When to Use
- After modifying a rule's logic or default values
- When auditing whether a rule matches real Chromium behavior
- When test.html cases might have false positives/negatives
- Before merging rule changes
Workflow
digraph verify {
rankdir=TB;
"Read rule source" -> "Read unit tests";
"Read unit tests" -> "Read test.html cases";
"Read test.html cases" -> "Cross-check coverage";
"Cross-check coverage" -> "Has gaps?" [shape=diamond];
"Has gaps?" -> "Report missing coverage" [label="yes"];
"Has gaps?" -> "Run Playwright verification" [label="no"];
"Report missing coverage" -> "Run Playwright verification";
"Run Playwright verification" -> "Visual screenshot check";
"Visual screenshot check" -> "Run unit tests";
"Run unit tests" -> "Report results";
}
Step 1 — Gather Sources
Read these files for the given <rule-id>:
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
src/rules/<rule-id>.ts |
Rule logic, checked properties, default values |
src/rules/__tests__/<rule-id>.test.ts |
Unit test cases and assertions |
examples/test.html (grep for data-rule="<rule-id>") |
Browser test cases |
docs/rules/<rule-id>.md |
Rule documentation (if exists) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 245 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 3ad909edd962
verify-rule is a skill published in the GitHub repository purupurupu/css-noop-checker (24 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,891 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aws-testing
Testing strategies for AWS workloads. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, contract tests, mocking AWS services, or setting up quality gates and CI/CD test pipelines.
memstack-development-test-writer
Use this skill when the user says 'write tests', 'add tests', 'test coverage', 'unit tests', 'integration tests', 'component tests', 'mocking', 'edge cases', or needs to generate tests with proper mocking and edge case coverage. Do NOT use for refactoring plans or database migrations.
atf-testing
Build ServiceNow Automated Test Framework tests and suites — impersonation, form steps, assertions, server-side script steps, test parameters, and execution via snowcreateatftest / snowexecuteatftest.
test-commander
Generate unit, integration, E2E, and visual regression tests following the Testing Trophy methodology (80% integration). Covers Vitest/Jest, Testing Library, Playwright, MSW for API mocking, snapshot strategy, visual regression (Chromatic/Percy/Playwright), test factories with Faker, and CI sharding. Use when user…
mandu-testing
Testing patterns for Mandu applications. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests. Triggers on test, spec, Bun test, Playwright, or testing tasks.
tabnexus-mcp-evals
Generate, validate, and run isolated Codex-to-TabNexus MCP evaluations with a curated 600-query dataset, executable gold tool labels, safety checks, and best-of-three stability scoring. Use when testing TabNexus MCP tool coverage, Agent behavior, regression quality, destructive-action safety, prompt changes, or a…