Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to pvliesdonk/scholar-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pvliesdonk/scholar-mcp/main/.agents/skills/applying-template-updates/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pvliesdonk/scholar-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pvliesdonk/scholar-mcp/applying-template-updates)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pvliesdonk/scholar-mcp/applying-template-updates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pvliesdonk/scholar-mcp/applying-template-updates/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pvliesdonk/scholar-mcp/applying-template-updates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pvliesdonk/scholar-mcp/applying-template-updates.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.02313 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00925 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00463 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00231 |
Grade A, and why
applying-template-updates scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- applying-template-updates — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 191 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Applying template updates
This is not a merge. In most copier projects an update is mechanical:
take what the template changed, settle the conflicts, done. Here the
template is authoritative. In every file copier update re-renders, each
line outside a sentinel block belongs to the template, and the update's job
is to bring this project back to the template at the target ref. Conflict
markers show only where git happened to notice a collision. Drift the
template did not touch in this jump rides through without one, so an update
with no conflicts can still leave the project forked.
That drift was written by this project, not by the template: an earlier commit put project content into lines the template owns. Your job is to recognise it as the project's decay, not to rationalise it. An update is done when every template-owned file conforms or has a Decay issue, not when the markers are gone.
docs/deployment/template-updates.md explains the update for a human; this
skill is the procedure. Work on the copier/update branch the workflow
opened (or the branch where copier update --trust was run). Stop and ask,
rather than guess, at three points: a conflict hunk inside a sentinel block,
an upgrade note you cannot perform (a secret, a repository setting), and a
seeded-file change you are not certain applies to this project.
1. Read the pull request body
Extract from it: the previous and target template refs, the compare link,
the UPGRADING.md sections for the jump, and the list of files with
conflict markers. If the body has no upgrade notes, fetch UPGRADING.md at
the target ref from the template repository — it is an index whose released
## vX.Y sections point at per-minor upgrading/vX.Y.md files — and fetch
every per-minor file from the previous ref's minor through the target's,
reading each one whole. Never grep or tail your way through them: each file
is complete for its minor, and the index enumerates which files a jump
needs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +94 lines · -13 tokens per session ac5796e29750
- 1mo ago First seen · 97 lines · 81 tokens per session scan A dc36a70a6566
applying-template-updates is a skill published in the GitHub repository pvliesdonk/scholar-mcp (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 2,313 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
Other skills, from other repositories
report-issue
File a bug or feature request against this repository (cyanheads/git-mcp-server) using the gh CLI. Use for tool logic bugs, git provider misbehavior, transport issues, auth/config problems, or new feature proposals.
reviewing-sla-definitions
Reviewing ServiceNow SLA, OLA and underpinning-contract definitions and how they perform: breach rates per definition, overlapping or duplicated definitions on the same table and target, and definitions that never attach. Use when the user asks about SLA breaches by definition, too many SLAs, duplicate or conflicting…
papi-build
Invoke when executing a build via buildexecute. Covers branching, gestalt pre-build check, and post-build audit.
papi-auto
Continue an approved PAPI cycle through implementation, verification and review using bounded autonomy. Resume durable work without rebuilding it; propose new scope before persisting it.
gitlab-discovery
Find a GitLab project or namespace and establish the exact target for follow-up repository, merge request, work-item or CI work. Use for GitLab project discovery, not local filesystem search or GitHub repositories.
cor-api-tools
Deep reference for all 61 COR MCP API tools — complete argument listings, JSON request/response examples, and common usage patterns for every module.