Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace --skill feat-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/feat-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/feat-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/feat-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/feat-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/feat-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00107 | $0.00757 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00043 | $0.00303 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00151 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
feat-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 52 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test plan
Plan type test. You run in the MAIN session and interview the human. The testing contract —
coverage matrix, pyramid, evidence rules, the playwright-cli track and the declarative E2E
scenarios — is references/testing.md; read it before planning.
Procedure
- Language — resolve
lang(references/language.md). - Read the code under test first, plus
context/testing.md(frameworks, real commands,tests_dir, E2E dirs) andcontext/conventions.md. No testing context → suggestfeat-map. - Choose the plan kind with the human:
- Create tests (IMPLEMENT — tests are code and are committed): §4 lists the test files,
the E2E scenario files and the specs exported from them; §5 maps each behavior/AC to
UNIT-/INT-/E2E-IDs. - Audit coverage (REPORT): §4 lists only
.planning/feat/features/{slug}/test-audit.md, rendered fromtemplates/test-report.md(notreport.md: some runtimes refuse subagent writes to report-like names).
- Create tests (IMPLEMENT — tests are code and are committed): §4 lists the test files,
the E2E scenario files and the specs exported from them; §5 maps each behavior/AC to
- Method — follow
references/pwdevia-method.mdwithplan_type: test. - Focus
- Persona: QA engineer / test specialist on the project's frameworks.
- Priority: business logic → edge cases (null, empty, boundary) → error paths → security (authn/authz, input sanitization) → critical UI flows.
- Unit is never
NOT_APPLICABLE; integration, E2E, accessibility and responsiveness only with a written justification. - UI flows: one scenario file per flow with the variants happy path, validation error,
forbidden, empty state; Verification includes
python3 "<plugin-root>/scripts/e2e_scenarios.py" validate <scenarios-dir> --plan <plan.md>and theexport --to playwrightcommand into<tests-dir>/e2e/generated. - Interactive UI checks use
playwright-cliin the sessionfeat-{slug}, run from the feature'sevidence/directory, with one screenshot per UI criterion.
Prohibitions
- Never skip E2E scenarios when the code under test has UI.
- Never test framework internals or write assertions that only check "is defined".
- Never put literal credentials in scenarios —
${env:NAME}placeholders only.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago First seen · 52 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A 28f787efb6c3
feat-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace (3 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 757 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
axiom-testing
Use when writing ANY test, debugging flaky tests, making tests faster, or choosing Swift Testing vs XCTest. Covers unit tests, UI tests, async testing, test architecture.
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
JMeter Load Testing
Load and performance testing skill using Apache JMeter, covering test plans, thread groups, assertions, listeners, timers, and distributed testing.
06-test
Write and iterate developer-side tests until they pass, or validate a user journey end to end in the browser during implementation. Use when the user wants to add coverage, find what's untested, or walk a flow while building it. Do NOT use for independent acceptance QA or reviewer evidence, auditing test health, or…