Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace --skill flow-simplifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/flow-simplify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/flow-simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/flow-simplify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/flow-simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/flow-simplify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00476 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00238 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
flow-simplify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 37 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Simplify without changing behavior
Read execution, collaboration, memory, artifacts, and safety.
MODE: ANALYZE
- Resolve an explicit diff or current phase execution scope.
- Read quality criteria, prohibitions, repository conventions, relevant memories, tests, and the full diff.
- Do not edit code in ANALYZE mode.
- Propose only changes with at least 80% confidence that preserve observable behavior:
- reuse an existing abstraction;
- remove proven dead or duplicate code;
- flatten needless control flow or indirection;
- remove avoidable work with equivalent semantics.
- Exclude bug fixes, behavior changes, speculative abstractions, broad rewrites, and style-only churn.
- Write
simplify-proposals.mdwith ID, confidence, kind, files, before/after sketch, evidence, risk, and verification command. - Present proposals by ID and stop. MODE: APPLY requires explicit approval; never analyze and apply in one uninterrupted step.
MODE: APPLY
- Require explicit approval listing proposal IDs. Ignore unapproved proposals.
- Re-read the current diff and stop if proposal assumptions are stale.
- Apply one approved proposal at a time within its declared files.
- Run its focused verification immediately. On failure, restore only that proposal's edits when they can be isolated safely; otherwise stop and request direction.
- Run the broader affected suite after all successful proposals.
- Append applied, skipped, and evidence results to
simplify-proposals.md. - Mark prior review evidence stale and set
REVIEW_REQUIRED.
Work inline by default. Use a worker only when the user explicitly requests delegation, and keep ANALYZE and APPLY as separate approval-gated actions.
Do not commit or change unrelated files. Return mode, proposal or application counts, report path, verification evidence, and next action.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 37 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 86e83997d0e1
flow-simplify is a skill published in the GitHub repository pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 476 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…