qa-report

qa-report is a skill for Claude Code from pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace. It costs 20 tokens per session (1,399 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A workflow that exports an already recorded QA run into a report package containing matching HTML and PDF outputs. It does not execute tests, create results, or reinterpret evidence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to publish a validated QA manifest when you have explicit project and manifest paths and want a new report package.
Why use it?
It preserves the recorded objectives, cases, evidence, defects, limitations, authorization, and verdict instead of filling in missing information.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the pwdev-qa plugin — 16 skills, 6 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to publish a validated QA manifest when you have explicit project and manifest paths and want a new report package.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-report
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace --skill qa-report
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install pwdev-qa, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 16 skills, 6 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for qa-report

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-report/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-report)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for qa-report

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,399 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.01399
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00560
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00280
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00140

Measured 1mo ago against content hash c8e77c57e520, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

qa-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/pwdev-qa/skills/qa-report/SKILL.md · 105 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Export a QA report

Export an already recorded QA run. This workflow publishes a report package; it does not create test results or reinterpret evidence commands. Read workflow, safety, artifacts, evidence, and reports first.

Inputs

  • An explicit private manifest path and an explicit project root path. Never infer either path from the current directory, a run ID, or a prior conversation.
  • The explicit objective or intent for the export, target identity, contract source/hash, complete acceptance-criterion catalog, cases, evidence, defects, limitations, recorded authorization, and existing QA verdict carried by that manifest.
  • Explicit authorization to create a new report package beneath the supplied project root. The manifest's run ID must identify a new destination; export never grants any other authority.

Procedure

  1. Preserve the explicit objective or intent, target, contract, criteria, cases, evidence, defects, limitations, authorization, and recorded results. Do not infer missing criteria, applicability, assessments, execution, approval, or risk acceptance.
  2. Identify the affected QA surfaces and consult installed applicable qa-specialist-requirements, qa-specialist-defects, or other qa-specialist-* skills only to expose semantic gaps already present in the supplied record. An unavailable applicable specialist is a limitation. Specialist guidance does not expand authorization or change the normalized manifest.
  3. Before export, require a complete acceptance criteria catalog that preserves all criterion IDs, text, applicability and reason, assessment expected and observed values, and referenced case IDs. Confirm the identified contract and completed criteria review are recorded. Missing semantic confirmation remains a limitation and prevents a newly inferred PASS.
  4. Use the explicit manifest and project root unchanged. The workflow invokes the exporter exactly once and never permits a second exporter invocation. Its only process invocation is qa_report.py report --manifest PATH --project-root PATH. Replace each PATH with its separately supplied path; do not add another subcommand, omit either option, or reuse an implicit root.
  5. Let the exporter enforce schema and verdict precedence. Before HTML or PDF rendering, the exporter must validate acceptance criteria, confinement, limits, hashes, target/contract binding, sanitization, and evidence safety. The exporter renders HTML and PDF from the same normalized manifest. It publishes only a complete validated package. Never edit the private or public manifest around validation.
  6. Preserve returned diagnostics, sanitization outcomes, and verdict without suppressing, repairing, or reclassifying them. Preserve export_status, output_dir, publication digest, and snapshot when present. Exit code 0 means both formats exported; it does not mean the QA verdict is PASS. Exit codes 2 and 3 remain refusal and incomplete export respectively.
  7. Stored command values are inert text. It never executes or re-executes tests, manifest commands, or evidence commands. It never uses a stored command to fill a missing result and never retries the export after a failure or collision.

Read the full file on GitHub · 105 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A c8e77c57e520

Subscribe to this mod's changes

qa-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace (3 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,399 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

foundry-hosted-agent-validation

Step-by-step process for validating a Python Foundry hosted agent sample (under python/samples/04-hosting/foundry-hosted-agents/) end to end — running it locally (native runtime and azd ai agent run) and after deploying it to an Azure AI Foundry project with azd. Use this when asked to validate a hosted agent sample.

microsoft/agent-framework · 82 tokens

document-query

Read, extract or compare PDFs, Office files, URLs and large text; OCR when vision fails.

agent0ai/agent-zero · 23 tokens

pdf-scan-config

Internal helper: manage .a11y-pdf-config.json scan settings.

Community-Access/accessibility-agents · 20 tokens

kb-report-generation

Reference data, not a reviewer. Format accessibility audit reports with severity scoring (0-100, A-F grades), scorecard computation, and compliance exports including VPAT/ACR and remediation priorities.

Community-Access/accessibility-agents · 44 tokens

kb-severity-mapping

Reference data, not a reviewer. Canonical severity level definitions and cross-domain mapping for web, document, and markdown audits. Score impact ranges, WCAG conformance alignment, and cross-format normalization.

Community-Access/accessibility-agents · 46 tokens

yellow-sheet-corpus

Run the Yellow Sheet chain end to end against ANY matter, from the original PDFs, and read the result honestly. Use whenever someone asks what has been tested end to end, whether a matter produces a usable sheet, how to onboard a NEW matter, or asks to re-run after a code change. Carries the intake mechanism that…

shawnclybor/clybor-claude-tooling · 173 tokens