qa-specialist-defects

qa-specialist-defects is a skill for Claude Code from pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace. It costs 29 tokens per session (1,561 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A defect-triage guide for recording and reassessing software problems with reproduction steps, expected and observed behavior, evidence, severity, priority, and retest history.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps write reproducible defect reports, assess user impact separately from delivery priority, link defects to requirements, and plan resolution retesting.
Why use it?
It prevents defects from being judged only by vague descriptions or mixed-up urgency and impact. It preserves the original failure and later attempts so resolution can be checked.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the pwdev-qa plugin — 16 skills, 6 commands shipped together

Good fit It helps write reproducible defect reports, assess user impact separately from delivery priority, link defects to requirements, and plan resolution retesting.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-specialist-defects
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace --skill qa-specialist-defects
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install pwdev-qa, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 16 skills, 6 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for qa-specialist-defects

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-specialist-defects/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-specialist-defects)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-specialist-defects"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-specialist-defects/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for qa-specialist-defects

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-specialist-defects"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace/qa-specialist-defects.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,561 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.01561
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00624
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00312
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00156

Measured 1mo ago against content hash dea6b491cbeb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

qa-specialist-defects scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/pwdev-qa/skills/qa-specialist-defects/SKILL.md · 107 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

QA defects specialist

Use this specialist when a QA workflow needs to record, triage, or reassess a defect for an identified target and contract. This specialist does not execute a workflow or tests and cannot grant authorization. Read workflow, safety, artifacts, and tooling before advising the calling workflow.

Inputs

  • Target, environment, build/change identity, identified contract, preserved criterion IDs/text, and applicable authorization.
  • Summary, prerequisites, deterministic reproduction steps, inputs, expected and observed values, frequency, affected surface, scope, and valid target-bound evidence.
  • Severity assessment based on product/user impact and priority assessment based on delivery order, urgency, dependencies, and business scheduling, each with its own rationale and owner.
  • Defect state, stable defect ID, linked or intentionally empty criterion IDs, original failure attempt, all later attempts, supersession links, and proposed or completed retest evidence.

Procedure

  1. Preserve target, contract, criteria, approvals, defect identity, and existing state. An empty criterion link does not make a proven in-scope defect disappear; record why it is unlinked.
  2. Establish reproduction with prerequisites, exact steps, expected and observed behavior, affected build/environment, frequency, scope, and evidence. If reproduction or evidence is insufficient, keep the finding explicit and BLOCKED; do not fabricate certainty.
  3. Assess severity from product impact and user impact independently from priority. Assess priority from delivery order and operational urgency. Record both rationales; neither value derives automatically from the other, and human risk acceptance does not rewrite the failure result.
  4. Preserve immutable history for the original failure and every retest attempt. Use stable logical case identity, increasing attempt numbers, and valid supersession links; never delete a failed attempt or rerun until pass.
  5. Mark a defect resolved only when its referenced terminal retest attempt is PASS and its evidence is valid, current, confined, target-bound, and sanitized. A blocked or failed terminal retest keeps the defect current; never fall back to an older passing attempt.
  6. Apply verdict precedence. Any proven current in-scope failure is FAIL, including an open or otherwise current defect whose criterion IDs are empty. Without proof of current failure, missing reproduction, evidence, or retest is BLOCKED. PASS requires all applicable criteria to pass and no current in-scope defects.
  7. Return the defect record, triage, history, retest state, evidence references, verdict input, and next authorized action without changing product code.

Read the full file on GitHub · 107 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 107 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A dea6b491cbeb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

qa-specialist-defects is a skill published in the GitHub repository pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace (3 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,561 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 16 tokens

langsmith-observability

LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 45 tokens

experimental-code-coverage-local-debugger

Runs code coverage locally via Universal Test Runner (UTR) or helper scripts, mimicking LUCI trybots. Activate when CQ tryjobs fail or underreport coverage, to test local GN/recipe repairs before uploading, or to debug hermetic crashes.

chromium/chromium · 59 tokens

verify-omnigent

Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…

omnigent-ai/omnigent · 100 tokens

cli-e2e

Write, modify, or debug Docker-based Composio CLI end-to-end tests under ts/e2e-tests/cli, including binary invocation, fixture isolation, output assertions, and package manifests. Use for CLI E2E test suites only; use cli-command for CLI source implementation.

ComposioHQ/composio · 62 tokens

adversarial-reviewer

Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…

emdash-cms/emdash · 72 tokens