goga-accept-manifest-review

goga-accept-manifest-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from qarium/goga. It costs 18 tokens per session (1,669 once invoked), scanned A, original, BSD-3-Clause.

A review process that compares a Cell's CODEMANIFEST with the code it describes. A Cell is a unit of code, and the manifest is its structured list of requirements and usage details.

In plain words
What is it for?
Running checks, reviewing each Cell, updating inaccurate manifests, and recording discrepancies that cannot be resolved.
Why use it?
It finds cases where the documentation and implementation disagree before acceptance.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Running checks, reviewing each Cell, updating inaccurate manifests, and recording discrepancies that cannot be resolved.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/qarium/goga/goga-accept-manifest-review
View source ↗ qarium/goga
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add qarium/goga --skill goga-accept-manifest-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qarium/goga

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for goga-accept-manifest-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-accept-manifest-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-accept-manifest-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-accept-manifest-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-accept-manifest-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for goga-accept-manifest-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-accept-manifest-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-accept-manifest-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,669 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.01669
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00834
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00334
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00167

Measured 12d ago against content hash 02cf7d2e06bd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

goga-accept-manifest-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

goga/assets/skills/goga-accept-manifest-review/SKILL.md · 203 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 203 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

goga-accept-manifest-review

Identity

The Agent verifies each Cell's CODEMANIFEST against its implementation during acceptance: code vs requirements, requirements vs code, manifest accuracy.

Core Principle

The Agent compares CODEMANIFEST with the actual implementation, updates the manifest as needed, and records any unresolvable discrepancies.

User Interaction Rule

Always provide response options. When addressing the User, always offer 2–4 concrete choices.


Algorithm

Step 1. Load Context

  1. Load the Acceptance Scope Report.
  2. Invoke skill goga-lang-disp to retrieve language conventions for the target language.
  3. Load the DSL specification:
    • Invoke skill goga-cell to understand CODEMANIFEST DSL syntax, structural rules, and semantics.
    • Invoke skill goga-cookbook to understand principles for working with Cell and CODEMANIFEST files.
  4. Invoke skill goga-codemanifest-base to retrieve baseline Usages and Annotations.

Step 2. Pre-flight Check

  1. Run the linter: goga lint.
  2. Record all errors as CRITICAL. Resolve them before proceeding.

Step 3. Per-Cell Review

Process each Cell listed in the Acceptance Scope Report:

Sub-step 1. Load Data
  1. Read the Cell's CODEMANIFEST.
  2. Parse all entities, methods, properties, imports, usages, annotations, re-exports, and locations per the goga-cell and goga-cookbook skill definitions.
  3. Enumerate all source files (exclude .usages/, build artifacts, and test files).
  4. Read every source file at its declared location.
  5. Verify the Facade file exists.
Sub-step 2. Code Analysis

Question: Does the code satisfy the CODEMANIFEST requirements, baseline practices, and language conventions?

  1. Run the contract comparison: goga contract <cell-path>.

  2. For each Entity, compare:

    • Constructor Signature: CODEMANIFEST vs implementation.
    • Methods: CODEMANIFEST vs implementation — per method.
    • Properties: CODEMANIFEST vs implementation — per property.
  3. For each Routine:

    • Signature match: contract result — CODEMANIFEST vs implementation.
    • Facade export: is the Routine exported through the Facade.
  4. Check Facade exposure — every Entity must be present in the Facade.

  5. Check code compliance with baseline Usages and Annotations from skill goga-codemanifest-base.

  6. Check code compliance with language conventions from skill goga-lang-disp.

Read the full file on GitHub · 203 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 203 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 02cf7d2e06bd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

goga-accept-manifest-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository qarium/goga (29 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,669 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

doubt-driven-review

In-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 90 tokens

autofix

Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 30 tokens

review-code

Review a code change well — engine-agnostic critical review discipline for an inline dev loop. Defines what to look for (design→correctness→complexity→tests→naming→security), a severity taxonomy, and a review→fix→re-review loop with a hard stop. Use on "review this code", "review my diff", "is this change good"…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 96 tokens

code-review

AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed (code/PR/quality/security). Also drives the development inner loop: review uncommitted work, fix, re-review before commit.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 61 tokens

code-quality

Drive static-analysis code quality in pi-agent-dashboard with Biome (analyze → fix → test), in changed-files or whole-repo mode. Use when asked to "improve code quality", "lint and fix", "clean up warnings", "fix Biome issues", "run static analysis", or when setting a code-quality goal. Skip for one-line edits.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 77 tokens

reverse-spec-from-code

Reverse-generate OpenSpec capability specs (openspec/specs/ /spec.md) from code that lacks them, or reconcile an existing stale spec with --refresh, using parallel subagents. Fans out one blind generator per capability, audits each spec against the code for hallucinations, and promotes only on user confirm. Use on…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 91 tokens