Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add qarium/goga --skill goga-define-goalsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qarium/gogaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-define-goals)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-define-goals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-define-goals/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-define-goals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-define-goals.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.01402 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00701 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00280 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00140 |
Grade A, and why
goga-define-goals scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 342 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
goga-define-goals
Purpose
Define the product outcomes that should be achieved by solving the identified problem for the relevant users.
Transform the established understanding of the product, problem, and users into a small set of clear product goals.
Goals describe the change we want to create, not the features or implementation used to create it.
Contract
consume:
- product
- problem
- users
produce:
- goals
Core Principle
A goal describes an outcome, not a solution.
The skill must answer:
What should become different if we successfully solve the problem?
Do not turn the user's requested feature into a goal.
For example:
"Build an export to Excel."
is not a goal.
A better goal is:
"Allow operations managers to easily share the relevant order data with colleagues who do not use the product."
The specific mechanism used to achieve this belongs to later stages.
Product Interview
Goals are product decisions and must not be inferred from the requested feature alone.
Use the problem and users to formulate candidate outcomes, then validate the intended outcome with the user.
Interview the user when necessary to determine:
- what should change as a result of solving the problem;
- which outcome is most important;
- whether there are multiple competing outcomes;
- what should explicitly not be optimized;
- whether the requested feature is actually the intended outcome.
Do not assume that the requested solution represents the user's actual goal.
If multiple reasonable goals would lead to materially different solutions, present the distinction and ask the user to choose.
Process
1. Connect goals to the problem
Review the established problem.
For each proposed goal, verify:
Problem
↓
Goal
The goal must directly contribute to solving the problem.
Do not create goals merely because they sound beneficial.
2. Consider the relevant users
Use users to determine what outcome matters to the people affected by the problem.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 342 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A d7918b639e94
goga-define-goals is a skill published in the GitHub repository qarium/goga (29 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 1,402 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
doubt-driven-review
In-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy…
release-cut
Cut a new pi-agent-dashboard release: promote ## [Unreleased] in CHANGELOG.md, bump every workspace package.json per SemVer, commit, tag v , and push — triggering the Release workflow that publishes every non-private workspace, builds the Electron artifacts, and creates a GitHub Release. Use on "cut a release"…
ship-it
Worktree-side implementation orchestrator for an OpenSpec change. Idempotent: gates automated scenarios on filesystem reality, owns the red-test fix loop, runs the docker harness with always-teardown, then drives ship-change inline. Escape hatch writes SHIPITBLOCKED.md. Runnable headless. Triggers: "ship it", "build…
spec-coherence-check
Sweep all active OpenSpec proposals for staleness, conflicts, and obsolescence against the current codebase and archived changes. Use when proposals may be outdated, when checking cross-proposal conflicts, or before starting a batch of implementations. Produces a gap-analysis report, updates a priority queue file, and…
faq-mine
Mine docs/faq.md from README.md, docs/.md, and the pi-hermes memory stores. Dispatches @fast subagents per source, dedupes against the existing FAQ, and merges entries in caveman style. Use when asked to "build / regenerate / extend the FAQ", "mine docs into FAQ", "mine hermes memory into FAQ", "surface runtime…
session-to-guideline
Turn a pi session into a Markdown "how-we-did-it" collaboration guideline: reads the session's JSONL transcript and synthesizes a reusable playbook of which prompts worked, what had to be steered, and how to reproduce the result faster. Use when: "document this session", "write up how we did X with the AI", "make a…