goga-review

goga-review is a skill for Claude Code from qarium/goga. It costs 9 tokens per session (784 once invoked), scanned A, original, BSD-3-Clause.

A dispatcher that chooses a specialised review procedure based on the file or directory you provide. It distinguishes architecture, design, plan, task, and code-cell reviews.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to route reviews of architecture documents, design documents, implementation plans, tasks, or source cells.
Why use it?
It removes the need to decide which review process fits a target file or document.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

Good fit Use it to route reviews of architecture documents, design documents, implementation plans, tasks, or source cells.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/qarium/goga/goga-review
View source ↗ qarium/goga
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add qarium/goga --skill goga-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qarium/goga

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for goga-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for goga-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 9 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 784 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00009 $0.00784
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00392
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00157
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00078

Measured 4d ago against content hash 923eb76042ad, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

goga-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

goga/assets/skills/goga-review/SKILL.md · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a dispatcher agent responsible for routing to specialized review skills. Determine the review type from the input and invoke the matching skill.

Dispatch

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Review Type Detection

  1. Arguments contain a path under the path printed by goga history path -f <kind>.md :

    • Derive the review type by <kind> (the filename without .md):
      • prd.mdprd
      • adr.mdadr
      • task.mdtask
      • arch.mdarchitecture
      • design.mddesign
      • plan.mdplan
    • Any other filename, or a path outside .goga/history/cell.

    Extract <target> (the topic):

    • For .goga/history/<year>/<topic>/<kind>.md<target> = <topic>
    • For src/cell/my-cell<target> = src/cell/my-cell
    • For my-cell<target> = my-cell
  2. Arguments are empty — ask the user:

    • question: "What do you want to review?"
    • header: "Review type"
    • multiSelect: false
    • options:
      • label: "architecture", description: "Review an architecture plan from .goga/history/"
      • label: "design", description: "Review a design document from .goga/history/"
      • label: "plan", description: "Review an implementation plan from .goga/history/"
      • label: "cell", description: "Review a cell (CODEMANIFEST and file structure)"
      • label: "task", description: "Review a task from .goga/history/"

Type-Based Routing

prd / adr

There is no review skill for this artifact kind yet.

  1. Stop execution and report to the user that PRD/ADR review is not supported.
architecture

Verify the path printed by goga history path -f arch.md exists.

  1. Not found — stop execution and report to the user.
  2. Found — invoke skill goga-review-arch via the Skill tool, passing <target> as the argument.
design

Verify the path printed by goga history path -f design.md exists.

  1. Not found — stop execution and report to the user.
  2. Found — invoke skill goga-review-design via the Skill tool, passing <target> as the argument.

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago Changed · +7 lines 923eb76042ad
  2. 8d ago First seen · 62 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 489b9b6174cc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

goga-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository qarium/goga (29 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 784 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

doubt-driven-review

In-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 90 tokens

autofix

Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 30 tokens

review-code

Review a code change well — engine-agnostic critical review discipline for an inline dev loop. Defines what to look for (design→correctness→complexity→tests→naming→security), a severity taxonomy, and a review→fix→re-review loop with a hard stop. Use on "review this code", "review my diff", "is this change good"…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 96 tokens

code-review

AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed (code/PR/quality/security). Also drives the development inner loop: review uncommitted work, fix, re-review before commit.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 61 tokens

code-quality

Drive static-analysis code quality in pi-agent-dashboard with Biome (analyze → fix → test), in changed-files or whole-repo mode. Use when asked to "improve code quality", "lint and fix", "clean up warnings", "fix Biome issues", "run static analysis", or when setting a code-quality goal. Skip for one-line edits.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 77 tokens

reverse-spec-from-code

Reverse-generate OpenSpec capability specs (openspec/specs/ /spec.md) from code that lacks them, or reconcile an existing stale spec with --refresh, using parallel subagents. Fans out one blind generator per capability, audits each spec against the code for hallucinations, and promotes only on user confirm. Use on…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 91 tokens