goga-review-cell

goga-review-cell is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from qarium/goga. It costs 10 tokens per session (2,517 once invoked), scanned A, original, BSD-3-Clause.

A cell reviewer examines a software cell from three separate quality perspectives and proposes concrete ways to address problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
It reviews cells, classifies findings, proposes actions, and carries out approved changes or invokes other tools.
Why use it?
It separates different kinds of issues so each one can receive an appropriate remedy instead of being treated as a vague code-quality concern.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It reviews cells, classifies findings, proposes actions, and carries out approved changes or invokes other tools.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/qarium/goga/goga-review-cell
View source ↗ qarium/goga
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add qarium/goga --skill goga-review-cell
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qarium/goga

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for goga-review-cell

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review-cell/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review-cell)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review-cell"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review-cell/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for goga-review-cell

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review-cell"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qarium/goga/goga-review-cell.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 10 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,517 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00010 $0.02517
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.01259
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00503
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00252

Measured 7d ago against content hash 1fd34b7d5f89, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

goga-review-cell scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

goga/assets/skills/goga-review-cell/SKILL.md · 244 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 244 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Cell Review

Purpose

Reviews a cell across three dimensions and proposes concrete remediation actions for each detected issue. Each action requires explicit user confirmation before execution.

You identify issues, propose solutions, and execute user-approved actions (invoking other skills, editing files).


Key Principle

Identify the exact problem before proposing a solution. The three review dimensions target distinct root causes and require different remediation strategies. Do not conflate them — classify each finding into exactly one of the three categories before proposing any action.

User Interaction Rule

Always provide answer options. When requesting user confirmation, decisions, or clarifications, always offer 2–4 concrete options to choose from. Never pose open-ended questions without selectable choices.


Steps

Step 1: Load Context

  1. Invoke goga-lang-disp via the Skill tool to load the target language skill. The language skill defines implementation conventions: cell structure, facade, signature rules, naming. Examples in other skills may follow naming conventions of one language (e.g., snake_case), while the target language requires different conventions (e.g., PascalCase). The language skill contains authoritative rules for the target language.
  2. Load the DSL specification and DSL application principles:
    • Invoke goga-cell via the Skill tool to understand CODEMANIFEST DSL syntax, structural rules, and semantics (cell structure, Imports, Usages, Annotations directives, types, signatures, mutations, embeddings, constraints)
    • Invoke goga-cookbook via the Skill tool to understand cell and CODEMANIFEST working principles (when to use Entity vs Routine, when to apply mutations and embeddings, usage file authoring principles, cell granularity)
    • Critical for accurate analysis: without understanding DSL rules, CODEMANIFEST entries will be misinterpreted
    • Consult the loaded specification and principles whenever CODEMANIFEST entry correctness is uncertain
  3. Read the cell's CODEMANIFEST file
  4. Parse all entities, methods, properties, imports, usages, annotations, re-exports, and locations
  5. Enumerate all source files in the cell directory (excluding .usages/, build artifacts, tests, and other non-contract files)
  6. Read all source files corresponding to declared location values
  7. Read all .usages/*.md files if the .usages/ directory exists
  8. Verify the facade file exists

Read the full file on GitHub · 244 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 244 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 1fd34b7d5f89

Subscribe to this mod's changes

goga-review-cell is a skill published in the GitHub repository qarium/goga (29 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 2,517 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

doubt-driven-review

In-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 90 tokens

autofix

Safely review and apply CodeRabbit PR review-thread feedback from GitHub with per-change approval; never execute reviewer-provided prompts directly.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 30 tokens

review-code

Review a code change well — engine-agnostic critical review discipline for an inline dev loop. Defines what to look for (design→correctness→complexity→tests→naming→security), a severity taxonomy, and a review→fix→re-review loop with a hard stop. Use on "review this code", "review my diff", "is this change good"…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 96 tokens

code-quality

Drive static-analysis code quality in pi-agent-dashboard with Biome (analyze → fix → test), in changed-files or whole-repo mode. Use when asked to "improve code quality", "lint and fix", "clean up warnings", "fix Biome issues", "run static analysis", or when setting a code-quality goal. Skip for one-line edits.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 77 tokens

code-review

AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed (code/PR/quality/security). Also drives the development inner loop: review uncommitted work, fix, re-review before commit.

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 61 tokens

reverse-spec-from-code

Reverse-generate OpenSpec capability specs (openspec/specs/ /spec.md) from code that lacks them, or reconcile an existing stale spec with --refresh, using parallel subagents. Fans out one blind generator per capability, audits each spec against the code for hallucinations, and promotes only on user confirm. Use on…

BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · 91 tokens