Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qGolem/orcnpx agentmods add skills/qgolem/orc/documentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qgolem/orc/document)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qgolem/orc/document"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qgolem/orc/document/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qgolem/orc/document"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qgolem/orc/document.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.03770 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01508 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00754 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00377 |
Grade A, and why
document scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 423 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Document
Generate a single documentation page from codebase exploration. Agents research the topic, orchestrator synthesizes findings into the doc directly. One file in docs/, diagrams in docs/diagrams/.
Input
$ARGUMENTS is the topic prompt describing what to document.
If provided: use as $TOPIC directly.
If not provided: AskUserQuestion:
- "What should I document?"
- Let the user type a topic description
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 423 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 3d22aa7f1e59
document is a skill published in the GitHub repository qGolem/orc (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 3,770 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
new-skill
Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes npm run validate and npm run evals on the first try — generates skills/{name}/SKILL.md (with the mandatory "Do NOT trigger for:" clause and a Process section citing guide step ranges) plus skills/{name}/{name}-guide.md (sequentially numbered steps), then appends…
llm-friendly-context
Clarifies inputs, outputs, success criteria, decisions, and unresolved conditions so downstream consumers can execute without guessing. Use when writing or revising LLM-facing prompts, handoffs, planning artifacts, reviews, reports, or generated instructions.
apex-review
Cross-cutting review of recent work — catches gaps between specialists. Use when asked to "review what we built", "check the work", "pre-launch review", or after completing a significant chunk of work.
prompt-tuning
Tune a prompt, or anything whose quality is measured by non-deterministic model output, without chasing noise - a noise baseline before the first edit, medians over repeated runs, enforcement AFTER generation rather than in the wording. Use when iterating on prompts or model-judged output.
brainstorm
Explores a codebase, researches the problem space, and produces an approved design specification before any code is written. Use when the user wants to create a new feature, add significant functionality, redesign a subsystem, or build something that touches multiple parts of the project.
performance-audit
Full-stack performance health check across 12 dimensions. Rendering, bundles, assets, API/network, algorithms, memory, database, caching, Web Vitals, backend runtime, concurrency, and framework-specific pathologies. Evidence-based Impact Models with confidence tiers and a prioritized optimization roadmap. Switches…