Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add qodo-ai/qodo-skills --skill qodo-manage-standardsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qodo-ai/qodo-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qodo-ai/qodo-skills/qodo-manage-standards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qodo-ai/qodo-skills/qodo-manage-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qodo-ai/qodo-skills/qodo-manage-standards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qodo-ai/qodo-skills/qodo-manage-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qodo-ai/qodo-skills/qodo-manage-standards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.07189 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.02876 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.01438 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00719 |
Grade A, and why
qodo-manage-standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 481 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Manage Review Standards
Description
Use Qodo managed tools to administer the workspace's Review Standards: capture a convention as a
new rule, edit or retire an existing one, re-scope it to a repo, triage the pending
suggestions queue, or discover review skills from a connected repository and configure them. This is
the write counterpart to qodo-get-rules (which only
reads and applies rules). Metadata, list, get, and schema inspection are read-only preparation;
perform them to make the proposed change concrete before asking for write approval.
Run bulk operations as a dry run first.
Prerequisites
- The optional Qodo Standards package is installed and loaded explicitly.
- A connected QAR managed-tools MCP server or authenticated Qodo CLI exposes the requested standards tool.
- Resolve the exact targets, scope, and intended mutation before each write; use approval covering that proposal.
Instructions
Choose the execution path
Use connected QAR MCP tools when the requested capability is available; otherwise
follow the CLI path. Read tool descriptions, inputSchema, and read-only/mutating annotations
from the host. Representative MCP names are rules-metadata, rules-list, rules-get,
rules-create, rules-update, rules-set-state, rules-set-scope, and rules-bulk;
review skills use review-skills-list, review-skills-get, review-skills-update,
review-skills-bulk, review-skills-source-repositories, review-skills-discovery-status,
and review-skills-discover. Verify names and JSON arguments in the connected catalog. MCP uses
typed arrays where its schema declares them, rather than CLI comma-separated flags.
For every MCP write, retain one stable logical-action idempotency key and send it as the
idempotency_key argument advertised by the live schema. A host that supports request metadata
may instead send _meta["io.qodo/idempotency-key"]; if both are sent, they must agree.
Reuse the same key and identical arguments on an uncertain retry.
Never generate a fresh key merely to retry an uncertain outcome. Preserve the exact user
approval, dry-run, read-back, and outcome rules below. Check isError before reading
structuredContent; a transport success is not proof of mutation. If a call becomes an MCP Task,
collect its terminal result before drawing conclusions. Do not switch to a
different CLI identity or tenant after an MCP authorization or permission denial.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +1 lines c1039e4c2d57
- 15d ago Changed · +184 lines · -67 tokens per session d6a32ad216ee
- 16d ago Changed · +20 lines · +2 tokens per session c90e1d152103
- 24d ago Changed dacd3fdd5cf4
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 4490e880546f
- 1mo ago Changed · -5 lines 0f234366742b
- 1mo ago Changed · +5 lines cb614746f431
- 1mo ago First seen · 268 lines · 160 tokens per session scan A 65329ccb5d65
qodo-manage-standards is a skill published in the GitHub repository qodo-ai/qodo-skills (59 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 7,189 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…