Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/developing-gtm-strategynpx skills add qte77/claude-code-plugins --skill developing-gtm-strategygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qte77/claude-code-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00777 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
developing-gtm-strategy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Developing GTM Strategy (Phase 3)
Target: $ARGUMENTS
Phase 3 of the GTM pipeline. Depends on Phase 2. Builds the actionable GTM plan: customer segmentation, ICP definition, channel strategy, and launch milestones.
Mode Awareness
Read config/mode.md before starting:
concise— Top segment, top 2 channels, 90-day milestones (bullet list)detailed— Full ICP profiles, channel analysis matrix, sequenced roadmapconservative— Proven channels (inbound, direct sales, partnerships); minimize burnambitious— Multi-channel blitz, community-led + product-led hybrid, aggressive land-and-expand
Inputs
results/phase-2/pmf-assessment.md— PMF score and risk registerresults/phase-1b/market-analysis.md— Buyer personas and market sizingresults/phase-1a/competitor-map.md— Competitor channel strategiesconfig/comments_gtm.md— GTM preferences and constraintsconfig/mode.md— Style and approach settings
Workflow
- Read Phase 2 PMF output — Use recommendation and risk register to shape strategy
- Define customer segments — Prioritize 1-3 segments with ICP definitions
- Select GTM channels — Evaluate and rank by reach/cost/fit for each segment
- Define positioning — One-liner, value prop, key proof points per segment
- Build 90-day launch plan — Milestones, owners, success metrics
- Validate against criteria — Check
config/validation_criteria.mdPhase 3 gates
Output
Write to results/phase-3/:
gtm-strategy.md
# GTM Strategy
## Target Segments
### Segment 1: [Name]
- ICP: [job title, company size, industry, trigger event]
- Pain: [primary pain]
- Value prop: [one sentence]
- Proof point: [evidence or analogy]
## Channel Strategy
| Channel | Reach | Cost | Fit | Priority |
|---------|-------|------|-----|----------|
| [channel] | H/M/L | H/M/L | H/M/L | 1/2/3 |
## Positioning
### One-Liner
"[Product] is the [category] for [segment] that [differentiator]."
### Key Proof Points
1. [proof point]
## 90-Day Launch Plan
| Week | Milestone | Owner | Success Metric |
|------|-----------|-------|----------------|
| 1-2 | [milestone] | [role] | [metric] |
| 3-6 | [milestone] | [role] | [metric] |
| 7-12 | [milestone] | [role] | [metric] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 90 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A c3714ed2abb6
developing-gtm-strategy is a skill published in the GitHub repository qte77/claude-code-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 777 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
orchestrator
FULLY AUTONOMOUS Flutter development pipeline orchestrator. Smart routing: PM analyzes -> creates targeted tasks -> Orchestrator executes only needed agents. Supports Asana task URLs. Includes QE verification via Maestro E2E tests. 7-phase flow: PM -> TodoWrite -> Execute -> Review -> Tests -> QE E2E -> Close.
flutter-guide
Flutter/BLoC Clean Architecture patterns, review checklists, and testing guides. Background knowledge for flutter-dev, flutter-reviewer, flutter-tester. Not user-invocable.
maestro-flutter
Maestro E2E testing knowledge for Flutter apps. YAML-based flows, TestKeys, visual regression, Maestro MCP integration. Background knowledge for QE E2E testing phase.
android-kotlin-compose
Android development with Kotlin and Jetpack Compose. Use when user mentions "Compose", "Jetpack Compose", "Material3", "Hilt", "Room", "ViewModel", or needs to build Android UI, implement MVVM architecture, manage Compose state, or integrate Jetpack libraries (Navigation, Room, Hilt, ViewModel). Triggers on…
android-kotlin-coroutines
Android development with Kotlin Coroutines and Flow. Use when user mentions "coroutines", "suspend", "Flow", "StateFlow", "SharedFlow", "viewModelScope", "lifecycleScope", or needs to implement async programming, handle structured concurrency, integrate coroutines with Retrofit/Room/WorkManager, or write coroutine…
codex-advisor
Advisory consultation skill for architectural reviews, design decisions, code analysis, and technology evaluation. Codex provides recommendations without making code changes. Invoked by phrases like "consult Codex", "get Codex's opinion", "ask Codex about", "have Codex review", "Codex analysis", "validate this…