Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/testing-gonpx skills add qte77/claude-code-plugins --skill testing-gogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qte77/claude-code-pluginsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00821 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00411 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
testing-go scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 116 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Testing
Target: $ARGUMENTS
Writes focused, behavior-driven tests following project testing strategy.
Quick Reference
TDD methodology (language-agnostic): See tdd-core plugin (testing-tdd skill)
Go-specific documentation: references/
references/testing-strategy.md— Go tools (go test, testify, rapid, gomock)references/tdd-best-practices.md— Go TDD examples (extends tdd-core)
Quick Decision
go test (default): Use table-driven tests for known cases. Works at unit/integration levels.
rapid (edge cases): Use for invariants that must hold for ALL inputs.
See references/testing-strategy.md for full methodology comparison.
TDD Essentials (Quick Reference)
Cycle: RED (failing test / compile error) -> GREEN (minimal pass) -> REFACTOR (clean up)
Structure: Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA)
func TestOrderCalculator_Total_SumsItemPrices(t *testing.T) {
// ARRANGE
calc := NewOrderCalculator()
items := []Item{{Price: 10.00, Qty: 2}, {Price: 5.00, Qty: 1}}
// ACT
total := calc.Total(items)
// ASSERT
assert.Equal(t, 25.00, total)
}
Table-Driven Tests (Go Idiom)
func TestValidateEmail(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
email string
wantErr bool
}{
{name: "valid", email: "[email protected]", wantErr: false},
{name: "missing @", email: "userexample.com", wantErr: true},
{name: "empty", email: "", wantErr: true},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
err := ValidateEmail(tt.email)
if tt.wantErr {
require.Error(t, err)
} else {
require.NoError(t, err)
}
})
}
}
What to Test (KISS/DRY/YAGNI)
High-Value: Business logic, error paths, integration points, contracts
Avoid: Stdlib behavior, trivial getters, default zero values, type existence
See references/testing-strategy.md -> "Patterns to Remove" for full list.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 116 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 9ef33d8462e6
testing-go is a skill published in the GitHub repository qte77/claude-code-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 821 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
orchestrator
FULLY AUTONOMOUS Flutter development pipeline orchestrator. Smart routing: PM analyzes -> creates targeted tasks -> Orchestrator executes only needed agents. Supports Asana task URLs. Includes QE verification via Maestro E2E tests. 7-phase flow: PM -> TodoWrite -> Execute -> Review -> Tests -> QE E2E -> Close.
flutter-guide
Flutter/BLoC Clean Architecture patterns, review checklists, and testing guides. Background knowledge for flutter-dev, flutter-reviewer, flutter-tester. Not user-invocable.
maestro-flutter
Maestro E2E testing knowledge for Flutter apps. YAML-based flows, TestKeys, visual regression, Maestro MCP integration. Background knowledge for QE E2E testing phase.
android-kotlin-compose
Android development with Kotlin and Jetpack Compose. Use when user mentions "Compose", "Jetpack Compose", "Material3", "Hilt", "Room", "ViewModel", or needs to build Android UI, implement MVVM architecture, manage Compose state, or integrate Jetpack libraries (Navigation, Room, Hilt, ViewModel). Triggers on…
android-kotlin-coroutines
Android development with Kotlin Coroutines and Flow. Use when user mentions "coroutines", "suspend", "Flow", "StateFlow", "SharedFlow", "viewModelScope", "lifecycleScope", or needs to implement async programming, handle structured concurrency, integrate coroutines with Retrofit/Room/WorkManager, or write coroutine…
codex-advisor
Advisory consultation skill for architectural reviews, design decisions, code analysis, and technology evaluation. Codex provides recommendations without making code changes. Invoked by phrases like "consult Codex", "get Codex's opinion", "ask Codex about", "have Codex review", "Codex analysis", "validate this…