Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/testing-tddnpx skills add qte77/claude-code-plugins --skill testing-tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qte77/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/testing-tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/testing-tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/testing-tdd.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00672 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00336 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
testing-tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development
Target: $ARGUMENTS
Writes focused, behavior-driven tests following the TDD Red-Green-Refactor cycle. Language-agnostic — works with any test framework (pytest, vitest, jest, cargo test, etc.).
Quick Reference
- TDD cycle + anti-patterns:
references/tdd-best-practices.md - What to test/skip + mocking strategy:
references/testing-strategy.md
TDD Cycle
- RED — Write a failing test that describes the expected behavior
- GREEN — Write minimal code to make the test pass
- REFACTOR — Improve code quality while tests stay green
- Repeat
Never skip RED. Every feature starts with a failing test.
Test Structure: Arrange-Act-Assert
Every test has three phases:
ARRANGE — Set up test data and dependencies
ACT — Execute the behavior under test
ASSERT — Verify the outcome
What to Test (KISS/DRY/YAGNI)
High-Value (test these):
- Business logic — algorithms, calculations, decision rules
- Integration points — API handling, external service interactions
- Edge cases — empty inputs, error propagation, boundary conditions
- Contracts — response formats, data transformations
Avoid (skip these):
- Library behavior — framework internals, third-party validation
- Trivial assertions — existence checks, type checks, default values
- Implementation details — internal state, private methods
- Styling/layout — CSS, class names
See references/testing-strategy.md → "Patterns to Remove" for full list.
Decision Checklist
Before writing a test:
- Does this test behavior (write it) or implementation (skip it)?
- Would this catch a real bug (write it) or is it trivial (skip it)?
- Is this testing our code (write it) or a library (skip it)?
Mocking Strategy
- Mock external dependencies (APIs, network, filesystem)
- Mock non-deterministic values (time, random, UUIDs)
- Use real services when in-memory alternatives exist
- Constrain mocks to real interfaces (typed mocks, spec=)
- Never mock internal functions in the same module
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 82 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 68445591255a
testing-tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository qte77/claude-code-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 672 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
auto-loop
TDD-based autonomous development loop with checkpoint recovery and observability changelog.
workflow
Run the complete 5-step development workflow: focus problem → prevent over-development → test-first (TDD) → document → smart commit. Use when starting a new feature, or when the user runs /workflow or asks for the full development flow.
test-first
Drive one feature through a strict TDD Red-Green-Refactor cycle with checklists for each phase. Use when implementing new functionality test-first, or when the user runs /test-first.
orchestrator
FULLY AUTONOMOUS Flutter development pipeline orchestrator. Smart routing: PM analyzes -> creates targeted tasks -> Orchestrator executes only needed agents. Supports Asana task URLs. Includes QE verification via Maestro E2E tests. 7-phase flow: PM -> TodoWrite -> Execute -> Review -> Tests -> QE E2E -> Close.
flutter-guide
Flutter/BLoC Clean Architecture patterns, review checklists, and testing guides. Background knowledge for flutter-dev, flutter-reviewer, flutter-tester. Not user-invocable.
maestro-flutter
Maestro E2E testing knowledge for Flutter apps. YAML-based flows, TestKeys, visual regression, Maestro MCP integration. Background knowledge for QE E2E testing phase.