Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add qte77/claude-code-plugins --skill tracing-requirementsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qte77/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/tracing-requirements)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/tracing-requirements"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/tracing-requirements/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/tracing-requirements"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qte77/claude-code-plugins/tracing-requirements.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00647 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00259 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
tracing-requirements scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Requirement Traceability Validation
Target: $ARGUMENTS
Validate the full requirement hierarchy by reconciling the requirements source with code docstring tags.
References (MUST READ)
Read these before proceeding:
references/requirement-tagging.md—@requirement/@parent/@testspec, reconciliation algorithm
Workflow
-
Grep all C files for
@requirement,@parent, and@testtags → build tag inventory -
Read requirements source —
docs/requirements.md, CSV, or SQL dump -
Validate 3-level hierarchy:
- Every SW-REQ has a
@parentPRD-REQ - Every PRD-REQ traces to a SYS-REQ
- No broken parent links
- Every SW-REQ has a
-
Generate findings report with categories:
- Unimplemented: SW-REQ in database but no
@requirementtag in code - Orphaned code:
@requirementtag in code but no matching DB entry - Broken parents:
@parentreferences a non-existent PRD-REQ - Untested: SW-REQ without matching
@testtag - Dead code candidates: Functions without any requirement tag
- Unimplemented: SW-REQ in database but no
-
Output coverage matrix:
| Requirement | Code File:Line | Test ID | Status | |-------------|---------------|---------|--------| | SW-REQ-001 | src/emv.c:42 | TEST-001| OK | | SW-REQ-002 | — | — | MISSING|
Output Format
# Traceability Report
## Summary
- Total SW-REQ: N
- Implemented: N (N%)
- Tested: N (N%)
- Orphaned code tags: N
- Broken parent links: N
## Unimplemented Requirements
...
## Orphaned Code
...
## Coverage Matrix
...
Rules
- Scan all
*.cand*.hfiles, not justsrc/ - Report findings — do not auto-fix requirement files
- Include file path and line number for every code finding
- Sort coverage matrix by requirement ID
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago Changed 70b829614724
- 1mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A c08c51a3126f
tracing-requirements is a skill published in the GitHub repository qte77/claude-code-plugins (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 647 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
flutter-guide
Flutter/BLoC Clean Architecture patterns, review checklists, and testing guides. Background knowledge for flutter-dev, flutter-reviewer, flutter-tester. Not user-invocable.
maestro-flutter
Maestro E2E testing knowledge for Flutter apps. YAML-based flows, TestKeys, visual regression, Maestro MCP integration. Background knowledge for QE E2E testing phase.
dummy-dataset
Generate realistic dummy datasets for testing with customizable columns, constraints, and output formats (CSV, JSON, SQL, Python script). Use when creating test data, building mock datasets, or generating sample data for development and demos.
test-scenarios
Create comprehensive test scenarios from user stories with test objectives, starting conditions, user roles, step-by-step actions, and expected outcomes. Use when writing QA test cases, creating test plans, defining acceptance tests, or preparing for feature validation.
improve-code-quality
Guided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy…
working-with-legacy-code
Safely change and test untested codebases using Feathers' "Working Effectively with Legacy Code". Use when the user mentions "legacy code", "no tests", "untested codebase", "how do I test this", "seams", "characterization tests", "golden master", "sprout method", "afraid to change this code", "monster method"…