Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add qualixar/superlocalmemory --skill slm-graphgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qualixar/superlocalmemoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qualixar/superlocalmemory/slm-graph)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qualixar/superlocalmemory/slm-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qualixar/superlocalmemory/slm-graph/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qualixar/superlocalmemory/slm-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qualixar/superlocalmemory/slm-graph.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.03017 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.01207 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00603 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00302 |
Grade A, and why
slm-graph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed f504b5ef4a68
- 4d ago Changed dacd7f6bfd04
- 5d ago Changed a220cf98b419
- 6d ago Changed · -6 lines 641b71c892f1
- 7d ago Changed 157135c451cc
- 8d ago Changed ddf8924cab78
- 12d ago Changed · +12 lines 53e417bcb18f
- 14d ago Changed 65ccd7a47200
- 16d ago Changed cc30b455c920
- 18d ago First seen · 316 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A 4c8ec43a4617
slm-graph is a skill published in the GitHub repository qualixar/superlocalmemory (254 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 3,017 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
latent-premises
Use when reviewing a diff or module for hidden assumptions - things the code takes for granted that nothing guarantees - or when asked "what could break this later", "what does this assume", or to harden code that works today. Complements bug-hunt: bug-hunt finds defects with triggers today; this finds the ones…
cartograph
Explore a codebase through Cartograph v2's native RocksDB code graph: intent-aware context, exact/BM25/hybrid search, callers/callees/impact, affected tests, live source, review, freshness, and bounded index administration.
code-review
A code-review procedure for examining supplied code or a change diff for evidence-based bugs, compatibility problems, and data risks.
engraphis-memory
Give the agent durable, scoped, explainable memory across sessions and repositories through the Engraphis MCP tools. Use when you learn a convention, decision, bug cause/fix, or user preference worth keeping; when prior context would help before you answer or act (to avoid re-asking or re-deriving); when asked "why is…
karpathy-guidelines
Surgical execution guardrails for coding, debugging, review, and refactor tasks.
code-review
Performs structured code review on a file or directory.