extension-review

extension-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from quangpl/browser-extension-skills. It costs 42 tokens per session (778 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A pre-submission scan of browser-extension source code for issues that can lead to rejection in the Chrome Web Store, Google’s marketplace for Chrome extensions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review an extension before submission and produce a Markdown or HTML report explaining detected issues, their causes, and possible fixes.
Why use it?
It helps identify compliance problems before submitting the extension, including unsafe code, excessive permissions, missing privacy information, and incomplete store details.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review an extension before submission and produce a Markdown or HTML report explaining detected issues, their causes, and possible fixes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/quangpl/browser-extension-skills/extension-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add quangpl/browser-extension-skills --skill extension-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/quangpl/browser-extension-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for extension-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quangpl/browser-extension-skills/extension-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/quangpl/browser-extension-skills/extension-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quangpl/browser-extension-skills/extension-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quangpl/browser-extension-skills/extension-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for extension-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quangpl/browser-extension-skills/extension-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quangpl/browser-extension-skills/extension-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 42 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 778 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00042 $0.00778
Opus 5 $0.00021 $0.00389
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00156
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00078

Measured 11d ago against content hash 44d606385519, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

extension-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/extension-review/SKILL.md · 89 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Extension Review (Pre-Submission Scanner)

Scan extension source code and predict Chrome Web Store rejection risks. Generate a clear report.

Reference: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/webstore/troubleshooting

Workflow (Execute This)

Step 1: Ask report format

Ask user: Markdown or HTML report? (default: Markdown)

Step 2: Locate and scan extension

# Find extension root
ls manifest.json wxt.config.ts plasmo.config.ts package.json 2>/dev/null

Step 3: Run all checks

Execute these scans in order (see references/scan-checklist.md for grep patterns):

# Check Violation Code Severity
1 Remote code execution (eval, external scripts) Blue Argon CRITICAL
2 Code obfuscation (base64, char encoding) Red Titanium CRITICAL
3 Excessive/unused permissions Purple Potassium HIGH
4 Missing privacy policy Purple Lithium HIGH
5 Missing metadata (icons, description, screenshots) Yellow Zinc HIGH
6 Single purpose violation Red Magnesium HIGH
7 Deceptive behavior (description ≠ functionality) Red Nickel HIGH
8 Insecure data transmission (HTTP) Purple Copper HIGH
9 Keyword stuffing in manifest Yellow Argon MEDIUM
10 Minimum functionality check Yellow Potassium MEDIUM
11 Undisclosed affiliate links Grey Titanium MEDIUM
12 Cryptocurrency mining code Grey Silicon CRITICAL
13 Copyright circumvention (download helpers) Blue Zinc CRITICAL
14 Notification spam patterns Yellow Nickel MEDIUM
15 Data collection without consent Purple Nickel HIGH

Step 4: Generate report

Output report using template in references/report-template.md.

Report structure per issue:

## Issue: [Name]
- **Severity**: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM
- **Violation Code**: [Chrome code, e.g. Blue Argon]
- **Root Cause**: [What in your code triggers this]
- **File(s)**: [Exact file paths and line numbers]
- **Solution**: [Step-by-step fix]

Read the full file on GitHub · 89 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 89 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 44d606385519

Subscribe to this mod's changes

extension-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository quangpl/browser-extension-skills (49 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 778 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

chrome-extension

Use when building or shipping a Manifest V3 browser extension and hitting its quirks — service worker dying and losing state, permission warnings, a Chrome Web Store rejection, content-script/worker/popup messaging, or an MV2-to-V3 migration. NOT a generic web app (that is nextjs), NOT a desktop shell (that is…

ericrisco/rsc-harness · 76 tokens

demo

Record a short demo VIDEO of a PR or feature — drive the repo's web UI in a real headless browser, capture the session, and composite a titled, size-capped mp4 with ffmpeg. Use on the docker QA image when the deliverable is a playable demo clip (single walkthrough or before/after comparison), not a text/screenshot…

nearform/lastlight · 75 tokens

browser-qa

Drive a real headless browser against a locally-served web UI and capture screenshot evidence, reporting step-level PASS/FAIL/BLOCKED with extracted DOM text and console errors. Use when a phase on the docker QA image must exercise a rendered UI and attach screenshots — it complements the text-evidence verify/qa-test…

nearform/lastlight · 69 tokens

website-explorer

Discover website capabilities from user behaviors. Learn APIs and automate workflows.

EndymionLee/PilotBrowseMCP · 17 tokens

codex-browser

Control Chrome via Codex Desktop's browser bridge. 52 MCP tools for tabs, navigation, DOM, input, CDP, network, file upload, dialog handling, and diagnostics.

DeliciousBuding/codex-browser-bridge · 41 tokens

browser-extension-patterns

Build browser extensions with Manifest V3 for Chrome, Firefox, and cross-browser compatibility. Covers content scripts, background workers, popup UI, storage APIs, and extension messaging. Triggers on browser extension development, Manifest V3, or Chrome extension requests.

organvm-iv-taxis/a-i--skills · 55 tokens