Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add quillai-network/quillshield_skills --skill dos-griefing-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/quillai-network/quillshield_skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/quillai-network/quillshield_skills/dos-griefing-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quillai-network/quillshield_skills/dos-griefing-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quillai-network/quillshield_skills/dos-griefing-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/quillai-network/quillshield_skills/dos-griefing-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/quillai-network/quillshield_skills/dos-griefing-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00108 | $0.03069 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00054 | $0.01535 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00614 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
dos-griefing-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 343 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DoS & Griefing Analysis
Detect vulnerabilities that allow attackers to make contracts unusable (Denial of Service) or harm other users at low cost (griefing). These attacks don't steal funds directly but can permanently brick contracts or block critical operations.
When to Use
- Auditing contracts with loops over dynamic arrays or mappings
- Reviewing batch operations (airdrops, reward distribution, liquidation)
- Analyzing contracts that rely on
address(this).balancefor logic - Verifying that individual user failures don't block system-wide operations
- Checking for gas-based attack vectors (insufficient gas, storage bloat)
When NOT to Use
- Direct fund theft analysis (use behavioral-state-analysis)
- Access control consistency (use semantic-guard-analysis)
- Reentrancy detection (use reentrancy-pattern-analysis)
Seven DoS & Griefing Vulnerability Classes
Class 1: Unbounded Loop DoS
Loops that iterate over collections that grow with contract usage. As the collection grows, gas cost increases until the function exceeds the block gas limit and becomes permanently uncallable.
// VULNERABLE: Loop over all users — grows forever
address[] public allUsers;
function distributeRewards() external {
for (uint i = 0; i < allUsers.length; i++) {
// If allUsers has 10,000+ entries, this exceeds block gas limit
token.transfer(allUsers[i], calculateReward(allUsers[i]));
}
}
// SAFE: Paginated processing
function distributeRewards(uint256 startIndex, uint256 batchSize) external {
uint256 end = min(startIndex + batchSize, allUsers.length);
for (uint i = startIndex; i < end; i++) {
token.transfer(allUsers[i], calculateReward(allUsers[i]));
}
}
// SAFER: Pull pattern
mapping(address => uint256) public pendingRewards;
function claimReward() external {
uint256 reward = pendingRewards[msg.sender];
pendingRewards[msg.sender] = 0;
token.transfer(msg.sender, reward);
}
Detection:
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 343 lines · 108 tokens per session scan A 99e869f7e65c
dos-griefing-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository quillai-network/quillshield_skills (121 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 108 tokens to every session and 3,069 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ansem-crypto
Use when evaluating crypto narratives, attention rotation, memecoin cycles, Solana-style ecosystem momentum, social distribution, and reflexive retail flows in an Ansem-style crypto market framework.
arthur-hayes-liquidity
Use when evaluating crypto markets through an Arthur Hayes-style liquidity lens: dollar liquidity, funding, risk appetite, cycle psychology, and macro-driven crypto positioning.
cobie-cycle-filter
Use when evaluating crypto decisions through a Cobie-style cycle filter: common-sense risk, narrative traps, leverage humility, and avoiding obvious stupid trades.
cryptocred-structure
Use when evaluating crypto charts through a CryptoCred-style structure lens: levels, confluence, market structure, risk definition, and educational technical process.
willy-woo-onchain
Use when evaluating Bitcoin and crypto cycles through a Willy Woo-style on-chain lens: holder behavior, realized value, supply dynamics, and on-chain demand.
prompt-proximity-architecture
Turn an approved measurement charter, ICPs, and buyer jobs into a budget-aware prompt coverage blueprint across proximity bands, aided status, information acts, journey states, roles, locales, evidence grades, partitions, and measurement lanes. Use before prompt wording to define required, optional, and prohibited…