Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/qwenlm/qwen-code/structured-debuggingnpx skills add QwenLM/qwen-code --skill structured-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00085 | $0.01721 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00860 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00344 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
structured-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 194 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Structured Debugging
When debugging hard issues, the natural instinct is to form a theory and immediately apply a fix. This fails more often than it works. The fix addresses the wrong cause, adds complexity, creates false confidence, and obscures the real issue. Worse, after several failed attempts you lose track of what's been tried and start guessing randomly.
This methodology replaces guessing with a disciplined cycle that converges on the root cause. Each iteration narrows the search space. It's slower per attempt but dramatically faster overall because you stop wasting runs on wrong theories.
The Cycle
1. Hypothesize
Before touching code, write down what you think is happening and why. Be specific about the expected state at each step in the execution path.
Bad: "Something is wrong with the wait loop." Good: "The leader hangs because
hasActiveTeammates() returns true after all agents have reported completed,
likely because terminal status isn't being set on the agent object after the
backend process exits."
For bugs you expect to take more than one round, create a side note file for the investigation in whichever location the project uses for such notes.
Write your hypothesis there. This file persists across conversation turns and even across sessions — it's your investigation journal.
2. Design Instrumentation
Add targeted debug logs or assertions at the exact decision points that would confirm or reject your hypothesis. Think about what data you need to see.
Don't scatter console.log everywhere. Identify the 2-3 places where your
hypothesis makes a testable prediction, and instrument those.
Prefer logging values (return codes, payload contents, stream types, message bodies, env state) over presence checks ("was this function called?", "was this branch taken?"). Code-path traces tell you what ran; data traces tell you what it ran on. Most non-trivial bugs are correct code processing wrong data.
Ask yourself: "If my hypothesis is correct, what will I see at point X? If it's wrong, what will I see instead?"
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 194 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A def8114708dc
structured-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository QwenLM/qwen-code (27,559 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 1,721 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
build-teaql-app
Build or change a TeaQL application in Java, Rust, Go, Swift, Python, C#/.NET, or TypeScript, including Kotlin/JVM applications that consume Java-generated libraries. Mandatory order: first draft and save a complete KSML model, then verify the client and evaluate that saved model, repair it through repeated evaluation…
agent-manager
Run a fleet of AI coding agents as live tmux sessions with agent-manager. Use when a developer is running more than one coding agent, needs to see which one is working or blocked, wants to spawn another on an independent task, or wants to review an agent's diff without leaving the terminal.
agent-manager-reference
Query agent-manager.dev's reference API and MCP server for documentation, the coding CLIs it manages, the tools its MCP server exposes, and the current release. Use instead of scraping the website's HTML.
loongsuite-pilot-insight
基于 LoongSuite Pilot / AI Coding Agent 日志生成事件洞察、组织洞察、数据质量、研发效能和 AI Native 使用类 SLS 报表时使用；包含 AI Coding 事件表语义，以及团队报表可选的部门维表、deptuser 组织关系、指标口径和公共 CTE，通常与 sls-dashboard-builder 一起使用。.
novel-workshop
小说创作工作台。用户说写小说、创作小说、写故事、写穿越文、写言情、写科幻、创作故事、开始创作、继续写、写下一章、多视角、POV、装订成册时使用。AI-assisted novel writing workbench for outline, characters, chapter drafting, multi-POV narrative, editing, and book assembly.
hooksmith
Use when designing or reviewing safe Grok Build hooks for linting, tests, formatting, notifications, command guards, lifecycle automation, or project hook trust decisions.