Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add qwerfunch/cladding --skill checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qwerfunch/claddingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00529 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00212 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Cladding check
Run clad check from the project root. Runs the 15 Iron Law stages — Type / Lint / Drift / Commit / Arch / Secret / Unit / Coverage / Spec-conformance / Deliverable-smoke / Smoke / Performance / Visual / Audit / UAT — and aggregates the worst exit code.
0— every stage cleared or skipped clean.1— at least one stage actually failed (fix-required).2— every result is skip (no fail-required input on the project yet).
--strict promotes warn-severity drift findings to error, matching the CI / pre-publish gate. The Drift stage runs every active detector under src/stages/detectors/ — npm run build:plugin Phase D recounts them and writes the integer into each plugin manifest (e.g. plugins/claude-code/.claude-plugin/plugin.json), so the number is never hand-maintained.
--internal shows stage codes (stage_1.1) instead of business names (Type). Default is the business-name surface; the audit log keeps internal ids regardless.
clad check
clad check --strict
clad check --internal
Gate economy (tiers)
Pick the cheapest tier that answers your question — the full pre-push suite is expensive and grows with the project:
clad check --tier=pre-commit— drift / arch / secret only (spec-vs-code, no full unit suite). Use for fast inner-loop feedback while implementing.clad check --tier=pre-push --strict— the full gate (type / lint / unit / cov + drift). This is whatclad done <featureId>already runs, so do NOT run it separately right beforeclad done— one authoritative full gate per feature, not two. A GREEN run refreshesspec/attestation.yamlwith the running Cladding version, strict blocking mode, detector-catalog SHA-256, module hashes, and feature markers. Seedocs/feature-cycle.md§ Gate economy.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 8e9cf445c426
check is a skill published in the GitHub repository qwerfunch/cladding (16 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 529 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
windows-qa-engineer
Use when testing Windows 11 desktop apps (WinForms/WPF/UWP) via UFO UIA/Win32 automation MCP. Triggers on "test this Windows app", "QA the app", "run smoke test", "click the button", "fill the form", "check the UI", "Windows automation", "UFO QA", "verify the dialog", or any Windows desktop UI testing task. Not for…
linked-intent-dev
Guide for linked-intent development (LID). Consult for ALL code changes. Walks changes through a mode-aware six-phase workflow (HLD → LLD → EARS → intent-narrowing edge audit → tests-first → code) with mandatory stops between each phase. Bugs walk the arrow like any other change — no short-circuit. Enforces cascade…
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code. Enforces red-green-refactor cycle with strict rules.
bug-fix-protocol
8-step disciplined bug-fix protocol that treats every production bug as two failures — the code defect itself and the testing system that allowed it through. Use when fixing a production bug, investigating a regression, writing a post-mortem, or auditing a missed defect. Triggers on "fix this bug", "production bug"…
bidirectional-differential
Audit coherence across an arrow of intent by running two parallel fresh Claude sessions — one reconstructs code from a single EARS, the other reconstructs the EARS from stripped code — then classifies the drift between them. Use when the user invokes /differential-audit, asks to audit EARS-to-code drift for a feature…
auto-loop
TDD-based autonomous development loop with checkpoint recovery and observability changelog.