orchestrator

orchestrator is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from qwerfunch/cladding. It costs 69 tokens per session (1,348 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A coordinator for projects managed by cladding, which uses written specifications and recorded checks to decide whether features are complete. It defines the required outcomes and judges the evidence; the host controls how agents carry out the work.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to enforce feature acceptance criteria, connect code to planned features, and apply the project’s completion checks.
Why use it?
It prevents code from being marked finished without a matching specification and independent verification.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to enforce feature acceptance criteria, connect code to planned features, and apply the project’s completion checks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/qwerfunch/cladding/orchestrator
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add qwerfunch/cladding --skill orchestrator
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qwerfunch/cladding

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for orchestrator

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/orchestrator/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/orchestrator)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for orchestrator

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/qwerfunch/cladding/orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 69 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,348 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00069 $0.01348
Opus 5.5 $0.00028 $0.00539
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00270
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00135

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 2c24be5b1aaa, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/antigravity/skills/orchestrator/SKILL.md · 74 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Orchestrator

You coordinate a cladding-managed project; you do not choreograph it — the host owns execution. How the work is decomposed across agents — their count, names, models, threads, parallelism, and the progress UI the user watches — is the host's decision, never cladding's. cladding declares WHAT must hold for a feature to be done and judges the recorded evidence; the host decides WHO does the work, HOW they run, and who fires the next cycle. Agents propose; the gates dispose.

See docs/ssot-model.md for the 4-tier SSoT model and docs/feature-cycle.md for the cycle in full.

The cycle contract (per feature)

Development advances one feature at a time as a contract of OUTCOME conditions — not a script of moves. A feature is done only when every condition below holds, and the deterministic gates (clad sync, clad check, checkAc at L4) are the hard ▣ barriers that verify them from filesystem + evidence truth, never an agent's say-so:

  • Spec-first. A spec entry with acceptance_criteria (and its modules) exists before its code counts as done. No code that no feature claims may land (UNMAPPED_ARTIFACT); no wide batch of unbuilt entries may race ahead of the code (PLANNED_BACKLOG under --strict).
  • Implementation satisfies the ACs. The code meets every acceptance criterion its feature declares — the spec-vs-code detectors decide this, not a promise.
  • Verification is independent of implementation. Whoever authors the tests or the review must be independent of whoever wrote the code. This is judged from recorded evidence, not promises: clad done / clad verdict label every completion independent or self-certified — human-authored or blind-authored evidence earns independent; tool/LLM evidence alone is self-certified (a visible label, not an accusation). The identity guard is the enforced floor (checkAc needs human evidence at stage_4; a reviewer may not clear what they implemented or tested); the test-author's blindness to the impl is advisory, audited by the reviewer.
  • Completion is earned, never written. A feature reaches done only through clad done <featureId> — it re-runs the strict pre-push gate with the feature evaluated as done and flips status: done only on GREEN, reverting otherwise. Never hand-write status: done.

Read the full file on GitHub · 74 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed 2c24be5b1aaa
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 1b758de0bdab

Subscribe to this mod's changes

orchestrator is a skill published in the GitHub repository qwerfunch/cladding (16 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,348 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

maintaining-windows-health

Hands-on playbook for Windows 11 disk cleanup, dev-machine optimization, and proactive health alerting. Use when the PC is full or slow, when a BSOD / Kernel-Power 41 / crash dump / commit-memory pressure happened, when the user asks to free disk space, audit storage, set up disk/memory alerts, or restore the same…

CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development · 191 tokens

prompt-engineering

Universal prompt engineering techniques for any LLM. Use when crafting, optimizing, or reviewing prompts for AI models. Triggers on requests like "improve this prompt", "write a system prompt", "optimize my instructions", "help me prompt engineer", "audit this prompt", "review my prompt", or when building agentic…

CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development · 76 tokens

installing-cli-tools

Install, upgrade, configure, and verify developer CLI tools safely. Use when a user asks to install a new CLI, command-line app, SDK tool, package-manager binary, GitHub release binary, language runtime tool, or AI/vendor CLI; configure shell PATH/completions; run first login; set API keys, tokens, or env variables…

CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development · 94 tokens

repo-activity-summary

Summarize a repository's recent engineering activity from git history — technologies, work types, churn hotspots, contributor patterns, and velocity. Use when asking "what has this repo been working on", "is this project active", "who contributes what", "where are the hotspots", or before onboarding onto an unfamiliar…

CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development · 70 tokens

clipboard

Copy text to clipboard with optional rich formatting. Triggers on "copy to clipboard", "copy that", "pbcopy", "copy formatted", "copy rich text".

CodeAlive-AI/ai-driven-development · 36 tokens

grok-cli

Delegate bounded tasks to Grok Build from a supervising agent such as Codex. Use when the user asks Grok to investigate, review, implement, or provide another perspective, or when a distinct coding agent would materially help. Includes a background ACP client for progress, follow-up prompts, permissions, and…

scarletkc/agents · 66 tokens