Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add racecraft-lab/Paddock --skill speckit-verify-tasks-rungit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/racecraft-lab/PaddockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/racecraft-lab/paddock/speckit-verify-tasks-run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/racecraft-lab/paddock/speckit-verify-tasks-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/racecraft-lab/paddock/speckit-verify-tasks-run/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/racecraft-lab/paddock/speckit-verify-tasks-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/racecraft-lab/paddock/speckit-verify-tasks-run.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.03608 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01804 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00722 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00361 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-verify-tasks-run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- speckit-verify-tasks — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
- speckit-verify-tasks — 100% identical, 5 lines differ
- speckit-verify-tasks-run — 94% identical, 9 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 218 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Supported arguments: Optional space/comma-separated task IDs to verify only specific tasks. Optional --scope branch|uncommitted|plan-anchored|all (default: all) to control which changes count as evidence.
Display the following advisory immediately before any other work:
⚠️ FRESH SESSION ADVISORY: For maximum reliability, run
/speckit.verify-tasksin a separate agent session from the one that performed/speckit.implement. The implementing agent's context biases it toward confirming its own work.
Pre-Execution Checks
Check for extension hooks (before verification):
-
Check if
.specify/extensions.ymlexists in the project root. -
If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.before_verify-taskskey -
If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
-
Filter to only hooks where
enabled: true -
For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
-
For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:-
Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}` -
Mandatory hook (
optional: false):## Extension Hooks **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command} Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
-
-
If no hooks are registered or
.specify/extensions.ymldoes not exist, skip silently
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 218 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A b84f3289a5b5
speckit-verify-tasks-run is a skill published in the GitHub repository racecraft-lab/Paddock (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 3,608 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mission-control
Interact with Mission Control — AI agent orchestration dashboard. Use when registering agents, managing tasks, syncing skills, or querying agent/task status via MC APIs.
codew-release-qa-sweep
Use before claiming Codewhale release work is done: run the full gate sweep and list the manual QA targets.
server-side-calls
Call tRPC procedures directly from server code using t.createCallerFactory() and router.createCaller(context) for integration testing, internal server logic, and custom API endpoints. Catch TRPCError and extract HTTP status with getHTTPStatusCodeFromError(). Error handling via onError option.
webapp-testing
Start/reuse a local app, wait for readiness, inspect rendered state/console/network, act from observed selectors, and verify with evidence.
mcp-app-verification
Comprehensive verification checklists for MCP Apps. Tests with basic-host reference, validates handler-before-connect, text fallback, resource URI linking, single-file bundling, host styling, CSP, and legacy pattern detection.
qa
Browser-based QA verification. Launches a real browser, navigates the app, clicks buttons, fills forms, and tests user flows. Works as a standalone skill or as a phase end condition in campaigns. Requires Playwright (optional dependency, graceful skip if not installed).