Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add radiantlogicinc/fastworkflow --skill supply-training-personasgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/radiantlogicinc/fastworkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/radiantlogicinc/fastworkflow/supply-training-personas)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/radiantlogicinc/fastworkflow/supply-training-personas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/radiantlogicinc/fastworkflow/supply-training-personas/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/radiantlogicinc/fastworkflow/supply-training-personas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/radiantlogicinc/fastworkflow/supply-training-personas.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00125 | $0.02351 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.01175 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00470 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
supply-training-personas scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Supplying training personas
The mechanism being changed
Training utterances are written by an LLM role-playing a persona. By default that persona is drawn uniformly from the whole PersonaHub corpus (~200k rows) and conditioned on nothing — a retail workflow and an identity-governance workflow get the same population of astrophysicists, sommeliers and marine biologists. Most drawn personas have no relationship to the vocabulary the application's users actually employ.
personas.json is how an application states who its users are. It changes the pool; the
sampling itself is unchanged and stays deterministic.
Two modes, one file
personas.json contains |
Source | Effect |
|---|---|---|
a non-empty personas list |
app_supplied |
Your personas are used verbatim. PersonaHub is never consulted or downloaded. |
domain_keywords (or domain) and no personas |
domain_conditioned |
PersonaHub is filtered to rows mentioning those keywords; the usual deterministic sample is taken from the survivors. |
| neither | — | error, not a fallback |
An explicit personas list wins over domain_keywords — supplying personas is the stronger
statement, and honouring the keywords as well would mix generic rows into a curated set.
The file
Discovered at <workflow>/personas.json. Both forms parse:
{
"schema_version": 1,
"domain": "retail order management",
"domain_keywords": ["retail", "e-commerce", "shopper", "customer service"],
"personas": [
{"id": "impatient-shopper", "persona": "A shopper who orders often, tracks every delivery, and types in short fragments."},
{"id": "support-agent", "persona": "A support agent handling returns and refunds all day; uses internal jargon."}
]
}
- A bare JSON array of personas is accepted, so a quick file needs no wrapper.
- An entry may be a bare string instead of an object; its id becomes its position.
- An object entry takes its text from
personaortext, and its id fromidor its position. schema_versionmust be1.domainprose with nodomain_keywordsis usable on its own — its own words (longer than two characters, lowercased) become the keywords. That is the least-effort form of the feature.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 189 lines · 125 tokens per session scan A 197e36b1210f
supply-training-personas is a skill published in the GitHub repository radiantlogicinc/fastworkflow (52 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 2,351 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…