Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ragnarok22/agent-skills --skill write-conventional-commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ragnarok22/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ragnarok22/agent-skills/write-conventional-commit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ragnarok22/agent-skills/write-conventional-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ragnarok22/agent-skills/write-conventional-commit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ragnarok22/agent-skills/write-conventional-commit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ragnarok22/agent-skills/write-conventional-commit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.00881 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00352 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
write-conventional-commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write Conventional Commit
Generate and apply Conventional Commits that follow the 1.0.0 specification.
Workflow
Step 1: Inspect commit scope
Run from repository root:
git status --short
git diff --staged --name-only
git diff --name-only
Use staged changes when available. If nothing is staged and the user asked to commit now, stage intentionally relevant files first and state what was staged.
Step 2: Classify intent into commit type
Pick the best type from change intent, not from file extension.
Common types:
feat: add a user-facing featurefix: fix a bugrefactor: code change without new feature or bug fixperf: improve performancedocs: documentation onlytest: add/update testsbuild: build/dependency toolingci: CI/CD configurationchore: maintenance that does not fit aboverevert: revert a previous commit
If uncertain between feat and fix, prefer:
fixwhen correcting broken behaviorfeatwhen adding new behavior
Step 3: Choose optional scope
Scope is optional and should be short and stable.
Prefer one of:
- top-level package/app (
api,billing,auth) - subsystem (
migrations,deps,release) - user-visible surface (
checkout,search)
Avoid broad scopes like misc.
Step 4: Detect breaking changes
Mark breaking changes when diff indicates incompatible API/contract behavior.
Signals include:
- removed/renamed public endpoints, fields, events, CLI flags
- required inputs changed incompatibly
- output schema changed incompatibly
When breaking:
- Add
!after type or type+scope (feat!:orfeat(api)!:) - Add footer:
BREAKING CHANGE: <what changed and how to migrate>
Use both when possible for clarity.
Step 5: Compose message in spec format
Use this structure exactly:
<type>[optional scope][!]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
Formatting rules:
- Header type must be lowercase noun.
- Put a colon and single space after header prefix.
- Keep description concise and specific.
- Put one blank line between header and body.
- Put one blank line between body and footers.
- Footer tokens follow git trailer style (
Token: value), except references may useToken #value. - Use
BREAKING CHANGE:as the canonical breaking footer token.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 139 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A c49c6b45f451
write-conventional-commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository ragnarok22/agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 881 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
repo-sync
Manage automatic Git syncing on macOS with repo-sync. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /repo-sync.
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…