Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rajitsaha/100xprism --skill competitor-alternativesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rajitsaha/100xprismWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/competitor-alternatives)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/competitor-alternatives"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/competitor-alternatives/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/competitor-alternatives"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/competitor-alternatives.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01666 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00833 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00333 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00167 |
Grade A, and why
competitor-alternatives scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to competitors — 96 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitor & Alternative Pages
Initial Assessment
Product context: If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it first and tailor output to it; only ask for what it doesn't cover.
Establish:
- Your Product — core value proposition, key differentiators, ideal customer profile, pricing model, strengths and honest weaknesses
- Competitive Landscape — direct and indirect/adjacent competitors, market positioning of each, search volume for competitor terms
- Goals — SEO traffic capture, sales enablement, conversion from competitor users, brand positioning
Core Principles
1. Honesty Builds Trust
Acknowledge competitor strengths, be accurate about your limitations, don't misrepresent competitor features — readers are comparing and will verify claims.
2. Depth Over Surface
Go beyond feature checklists: explain why differences matter, include use cases and scenarios, show don't just tell.
3. Help Them Decide
Different tools fit different needs. Be clear about who you're best for and who the competitor is best for. Reduce evaluation friction.
4. Modular Content Architecture
Centralize competitor data — single source of truth per competitor so updates propagate to all pages.
Page Formats
Format 1: [Competitor] Alternative (Singular)
Search intent: Actively looking to switch from a specific competitor
URL pattern: /alternatives/[competitor] or /[competitor]-alternative
Target keywords: "[Competitor] alternative", "alternative to [Competitor]", "switch from [Competitor]"
Page structure:
- Why people look for alternatives (validate their pain)
- Summary: You as the alternative (quick positioning)
- Detailed comparison (features, service, pricing)
- Who should switch (and who shouldn't)
- Migration path
- Social proof from switchers
- CTA
Format 2: [Competitor] Alternatives (Plural)
Search intent: Researching options, earlier in journey
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 219 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 6e14fe516f0a
competitor-alternatives is a skill published in the GitHub repository rajitsaha/100xprism (10 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,666 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to competitors, differing in 96 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ad-campaign-analyzer
Analyze cross-channel campaign data, quantify uncertainty, and propose evidence-labeled budget tests without overstating causality.
google-analytics
Skill "google-analytics" from VKirill/claude-lane-stack, covering version requirements (may 2026), usage, use this skill when, do not use this skill when and purpose.
google-tag-manager
Skill "google-tag-manager" from VKirill/claude-lane-stack, covering 🎯 version requirements (june 2026), usage, use this skill when, do not use this skill when and purpose.
analyzing-windows-lnk-files-for-artifacts
Parse Windows LNK shortcut files to extract target paths, timestamps, volume information, and machine identifiers for forensic timeline reconstruction.
analyzing-memory-forensics-with-lime-and-volatility
Performs Linux memory acquisition using LiME (Linux Memory Extractor) kernel module and analysis with Volatility 3 framework. Extracts process lists, network connections, bash history, loaded kernel modules, and injected code from Linux memory images. Use when performing incident response on compromised Linux systems.
laravel-api
Build production-ready RESTful APIs with Laravel. Covers authentication (Sanctum/Passport), versioning, resources, rate limiting, and API testing.