Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rakutentech/sorify --skill sorify-updategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rakutentech/sorifyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rakutentech/sorify/sorify-update)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rakutentech/sorify/sorify-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rakutentech/sorify/sorify-update/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rakutentech/sorify/sorify-update"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rakutentech/sorify/sorify-update.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00412 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00165 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
sorify-update scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Update an existing Sorify test
Use this skill when the user wants to revise, replace, or upload new code to an
existing Sorify test case. This is different from creating a new test with
bulk_create_tests.
Workflow
-
Resolve the target suite and test. Use
list_suites,get_suite,list_tests, orget_testas needed. If the name is ambiguous, ask the user to choose rather than updating the wrong test. -
Call
get_testbefore changing the code so the current test and its target are understood. -
Generate or revise the Playwright code using the shared guidance in
../shared/generator-patterns.mdand, for source-repository mode, the analyzer, designer, and mock-generation references in that directory. -
Replace the existing code with the Sorify MCP tool:
update_test_code({ suite_id: <suite id>, test_id: <test id>, playwright_code: <new code>, ai_model: <the actual model name> }) -
Report the updated test and explain that Sorify archived the previous code as a restorable version. Do not use
bulk_create_testsfor this workflow; that creates new test cases instead of adding a version to the existing case.
The update_test_code tool validates the new code, reactivates the test, and
records the model attribution. Never copy the private MCP credentials from
~/.sorify into suite variables or test code.
If the user asks to restore a historical version, explain that the current
MCP server exposes version creation through update_test_code; historical
version restoration remains a dashboard operation unless a dedicated restore
tool is available from the connected server.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A e21a34b6dc88
sorify-update is a skill published in the GitHub repository rakutentech/sorify (50 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 412 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-qa
Test an AI-built web app like a senior QA engineer before release. Use when the user asks to test, QA, verify, ship, check regressions, inspect a browser flow, or decide whether a web app is ready to launch.
ui-test-cypress
Use this skill when you need to design Cypress e2e and component testing plans with commands, fixtures, network stubbing, and CI reporting; triggers include Cypress UI testing, UI automation testing, and ui-test-cypress.
ui-test-playwright
Use this skill when you need to design Playwright Test suites with fixtures, projects, traces, screenshots, API plus UI coverage, and CI reporting; triggers include Playwright UI testing, UI automation testing, and ui-test-playwright.
ui-test-puppeteer
Use this skill when you need to design Puppeteer automation for Chromium-driven checks, screenshots, PDFs, network interception, and CDP use cases; triggers include Puppeteer UI testing, UI automation testing, and ui-test-puppeteer.
ui-test-selenium
Use this skill when you need to design Selenium WebDriver UI automation plans with stable locators, waits, Page Objects, Grid, and CI execution; triggers include Selenium UI testing, UI automation testing, and ui-test-selenium.
ui-test-testcafe
Use this skill when you need to design TestCafe UI automation with fixtures, selectors, roles, browser matrix execution, and reports; triggers include TestCafe UI testing, UI automation testing, and ui-test-testcafe.