Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ralvarezdev/ralvaskills --skill security-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ralvarezdev/ralvaskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ralvarezdev/ralvaskills/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ralvarezdev/ralvaskills/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ralvarezdev/ralvaskills/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ralvarezdev/ralvaskills/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ralvarezdev/ralvaskills/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.02230 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00892 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00446 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00223 |
Grade B, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Cloud metadata endpointmediumServer-side request forgery
One request to 169.254.169.254 can return temporary IAM credentials.
- **SSRF:** outbound HTTP from server-side code that takes a user-supplied URL must validate — block private IP ranges (`10.0.0.0/8`, `192.168.0.0/16`, `127.0.0.0/8`, `169.254.169.254` AWS metadata), enforce HTTPS, restr Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- **Command injection.** Any `subprocess.run(..., shell=True)`, `os.system`, `exec.Command("sh", "-c", userInput)`. Use list-form args. The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 62 tokens per session scan B 4292e39170e6
security-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository ralvarezdev/ralvaskills (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 2,230 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (cloud metadata endpoint, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
release
CONTRIBUTOR TOOL - Cut a plugin release: bump plugin.json version, finalize CHANGELOG, update README if needed, gate on make ci, commit, tag vX.Y.Z, and create the GitHub release. Use when shipping a new plugin version. NOT distributed.
watch-pr
Watch an Elixir/Phoenix PR for new review comments (bot + human) and CI results via a background watcher that wakes Claude only on real events. Use after opening a PR or pushing, while waiting on CI or reviewers.
catchup
Summarize and review what changed while you were away. Use after a weekend, vacation, or flight to check missed PRs, git commits, Linear tickets, and meetings — one prioritized brief, not a firehose.
pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
056-design-avoid-breaking-changes
Use when you need to review a plan, OpenSpec change, specification, or implementation proposal for breaking-change risk across commands, skills, generated outputs, XML sources, README/docs, tests, CI, APIs, schemas, configuration, data, migration, and release guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Review…