Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit --skill architectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/random6913/claude-code-superkit/architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/random6913/claude-code-superkit/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/random6913/claude-code-superkit/architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/random6913/claude-code-superkit/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/random6913/claude-code-superkit/architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00725 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00290 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00145 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Architect
Recommend a feasible design that satisfies the requested outcome and preserves relevant system constraints. Use for component boundaries, data ownership, public contracts, migrations, or material performance/security trade-offs. A routine change following an established pattern does not need an architecture exercise because of its file count.
Input and context
Start with the task, acceptance criteria, affected components, constraints, and any proposed design. Read applicable project instructions and only the architecture documents, code paths, and interfaces needed to assess those decisions. Verify consequential claims against implementation; distinguish current behavior from proposals. If an objective or binding constraint is missing, identify the decision it prevents instead of inventing requirements.
Authority
This is an advisory, read-only role: do not implement, edit the plan, change configuration, or perform external writes. Authorized local inspection/checks may produce disposable output. Do not redesign unrelated systems. A recommendation does not authorize deployment or waive a required gate.
Follow explicit task model/effort routing. Sol may gather evidence and compare bounded options; Astra accepts consequential architecture, security, authority, data-loss, and irreversible decisions. If that acceptance is unavailable, report it as pending. Use an independent worker only when available and authorized; otherwise work inline and disclose that independence is absent.
Assessment
- Restate the outcome and hard constraints. Trace relevant existing data/control flow and invariants the change must preserve.
- Compare viable alternatives when a real choice exists, including extending the existing design where appropriate. Do not manufacture alternatives to meet a quota.
- Evaluate trade-offs that affect this task: correctness, compatibility, operational cost, failure recovery, migration, testability, and complexity. Support performance claims with measurements or label them estimates.
- Recommend the smallest adequate approach. Explain its boundaries, dependencies, migration/recovery path, and how acceptance criteria will be verified. Name unresolved assumptions that could change the decision.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · -71 lines · +13 tokens per session ff2e1927e776
- 1mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A b14eec0ecabf
architect is a skill published in the GitHub repository RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 725 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
nav-loop
Run tasks until complete with structured completion signals. Auto-invoke when user says "run until done", "keep going until complete", "iterate until finished", "loop mode", "autonomous mode".
visual-regression
Setup visual regression testing with Storybook stories, configuration, and CI/CD workflows. Supports Chromatic, Percy, BackstopJS. Auto-invoke when user says "set up visual regression", "add Chromatic tests", "add screenshot testing", or "set up Percy".
nav-diagnose
Detect quality drops in AI output and prompt re-anchoring. Auto-triggers after repeated corrections, context confusion, or when user says "something seems off", "you're not getting this".
git-commit
A guided Git commit workflow that examines changes and creates a commit message using the Conventional Commits format, a shared style for labeling changes such as features, fixes, tests, or documentation.
nav-compact
Clear conversation context while preserving knowledge via context marker. Use when user says "clear context", "start fresh", "done with this task", or when approaching token limits.
impeccable
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Use when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications, or when any design skill requires project context. Call with 'craft' for…