Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/random6913/claude-code-superkit/gan-plannernpx skills add RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit --skill gan-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/random6913/claude-code-superkit/gan-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/random6913/claude-code-superkit/gan-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/random6913/claude-code-superkit/gan-planner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.02041 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01020 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00408 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
gan-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 205 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GAN Planner
Step 1 of 3 in the GAN (Generative Adversarial Network) harness. Turns a feature brief into falsifiable, Playwright-testable scenarios plus a rubric handoff, so gan-generator knows exactly what to build and gan-evaluator knows exactly how to score it. Codex CLI has no subagents: run this as the first of three skills in sequence — its markdown plan is the literal input to the generator step.
Hard Rules
- Every scenario MUST carry all four assertion types: visual, state, persistence, timing.
- The plan MUST fill the four fixed scenario slots — happy / empty / error / auth-required. A slot may read
N/A — <reason>only when it genuinely cannot apply (e.g., auth-required on a fully public page). - The plan MUST include the
## Rubricsection: rubric file(s), applicable criteria count N per rubric, N/A rows with reasons, extra criteria.gan-evaluatorscores X / N from this section — omitting it breaks the loop. - NEVER pause to ask the user mid-run. When the spec leaves a question open, record it under
## Assumptionswith the assumption you proceed on. - Every scenario states what the user sees on failure as concretely as on success.
- Name the exact Playwright test file path the generator must create.
Phase 0 — Load Project Context
Read if present, skip silently if absent:
CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md— project conventions, test setupplaywright.config.*— what's already wired up- Existing tests in
tests/e2e/ore2e/— reuse patterns and helpers - Rubric files in
.claude/rubrics/(if not found: glob**/rubrics/ui-quality.md; still missing → noteNOT FOUND: <path>in the plan and use the default totals in Step 5) - The feature spec / brief from the user
Use it to make the plan executable in this project, not a generic template.
When to Use
- Before
gan-generatorwrites code for a UI / interactive feature - For features where "looks right" matters (UX flows, forms, dashboards, components)
- For changes where a passing unit test is insufficient evidence of correctness
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 205 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A f27125b661a0
gan-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 2,041 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
apm-review-panel
Use this skill to run a multi-persona expert advisory review on a labelled pull request in microsoft/apm. The panel fans out to five mandatory specialists plus a test-coverage specialist (active on every PR that touches src/) plus three conditional specialists (auth, doc-writer, performance-expert), all running in…
apm-issue-autopilot
Use this skill to drive any open microsoft/apm issue (bug, feature, docs, refactor, perf) from raw intake to a mergeable PR with triage as the central, paramount gate. Run the apm-triage-panel rubric per issue first, then present ONE consolidated triage review for the whole batch and escalate to the maintainer BY…
apm-spec-guardian
Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed…
apm-triage-panel
Use this skill to triage one microsoft/apm issue selected by the daily sweep, the status/needs-triage fast path, or manual dispatch. Emit one synthesized comment with a decision, label set, exact milestone, and suggested next action.
cli-logging-ux
Use this skill when editing or creating CLI output, logging, warnings, error messages, progress indicators, or diagnostic summaries in the APM codebase. Activate whenever code touches console helpers (richsuccess, richwarning, richerror, richinfo, richecho), DiagnosticCollector, STATUSSYMBOLS, CommandLogger, or any…
pr-description-skill
Use this skill to write the PR description (PR body) for any pull request opened against microsoft/apm. Produces one self-sufficient GitHub-Flavored Markdown artifact: TL;DR, Problem (WHY), Approach (WHAT), Implementation (HOW), 1-3 validated mermaid diagrams, explicit trade-offs, validation evidence, and a…