doc-maturity-eval

doc-maturity-eval is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from randomm/pi-ensemble. It costs 167 tokens per session (1,814 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review process that assesses how complete, useful, and well-maintained a software project's technical documentation is.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit repository files or uploaded documents, build a documentation profile, and save prioritized recommendations.
Why use it?
It reveals missing guidance, such as setup instructions, architecture decisions, or emergency runbooks, that can slow developers and operators down.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/randomm/pi-ensemble/doc-maturity-eval
Any agent
npx skills add randomm/pi-ensemble --skill doc-maturity-eval
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/randomm/pi-ensemble

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for doc-maturity-eval

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/randomm/pi-ensemble/doc-maturity-eval.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/randomm/pi-ensemble/doc-maturity-eval)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/randomm/pi-ensemble/doc-maturity-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/randomm/pi-ensemble/doc-maturity-eval.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 167 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,814 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00167 $0.01814
Opus 5 $0.00084 $0.00907
Sonnet 5 $0.00033 $0.00363
Haiku 4.5 $0.00017 $0.00181

Measured 4d ago against content hash 27b9beb0ce0b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

doc-maturity-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skill/doc-maturity-eval/SKILL.md · 166 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Documentation Maturity Evaluator

You evaluate the maturity and completeness of a software project's technical documentation. Your assessment covers every dimension that matters — from whether a README exists to whether operational runbooks would actually help someone at 3am during an incident.

The output is always a structured evaluation report saved as a markdown file.

How this works

Documentation maturity isn't a single score — it's a profile across multiple dimensions. A project might have excellent API docs but no architecture decision records. Another might have great onboarding guides but no runbooks. Your job is to build that profile, surface the gaps, and give actionable recommendations prioritized by impact.

Evaluation workflow

1. Gather context

Before evaluating, understand what you're working with. The user might provide:

  • A repository or file tree — scan it for documentation files, READMEs, wikis, doc folders, inline comments, config files with descriptions
  • Uploaded documents — read them all and catalog what they cover
  • A verbal description — "we have a README, some API docs in Swagger, and a Confluence space with onboarding guides"
  • A mix — some files plus some description of what else exists elsewhere

Ask clarifying questions only about things that materially affect the evaluation:

  • What kind of project is this? (library, API service, platform, CLI tool, mobile app, data pipeline, infrastructure)
  • What's the team size and who are the documentation audiences? (just the team? external developers? end users? ops?)
  • Is this open source or internal?
  • Are there docs that live outside what you can see? (Confluence, Notion, wiki, separate docs site)

Don't over-interview. If the user gives you a repo to scan, scan it and start evaluating. You can flag assumptions in the report.

2. Evaluate across all dimensions

Read the evaluation rubric in references/rubric.md before scoring. It contains the detailed criteria for each dimension and maturity level.

Read the full file on GitHub · 166 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 166 lines · 167 tokens per session scan A 27b9beb0ce0b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

doc-maturity-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository randomm/pi-ensemble (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 167 tokens to every session and 1,814 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens