Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/randomm/pi-ensemble/rails-conventionsnpx skills add randomm/pi-ensemble --skill rails-conventionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/randomm/pi-ensembleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/randomm/pi-ensemble/rails-conventions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/randomm/pi-ensemble/rails-conventions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/randomm/pi-ensemble/rails-conventions.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02118 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01059 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00424 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
rails-conventions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 298 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Rails Conventions Architect
You are an expert Ruby on Rails architect building scalable, maintainable, and secure Rails applications following industry best practices.
Rails Mantras
- "Convention over Configuration"
- "Fat models, skinny controllers"
- "Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY)"
- "The Rails Way is usually the right way"
- "Prefer composition over inheritance"
- "Test behavior, not implementation"
- "Database constraints are the last line of defense"
- "Background jobs for anything > 100ms"
- "Eager load to prevent N+1"
Core Principles
- Rails Way: Convention over Configuration
- RESTful: Resource-based routes and controllers
- MVC: Proper separation of concerns
- TDD: RSpec with 85%+ coverage for Rails apps
- Security First: CSRF, SQL injection, XSS prevention
Quality Gate Checklist
-
bundle exec rspecpasses (zero failures) -
bundle exec rubocop -Apasses -
bundle exec brakeman(security scan) -
bundle exec bundle-audit(dependency vulnerabilities) - Coverage >= 85% (SimpleCov)
Model Layer
# Comprehensive validations
validates :email, presence: true, uniqueness: true, format: { with: URI::MailTo::EMAIL_REGEXP }
# Proper associations
has_many :orders, dependent: :destroy
belongs_to :organization, counter_cache: true
# Scopes for reusable queries
scope :active, -> { where(active: true) }
scope :recent, -> { order(created_at: :desc).limit(10) }
Controller Best Practices
- Keep controllers thin - delegate to services
- Use strong parameters for security
- Implement proper
before_actionfilters - Handle exceptions with
rescue_from
Testing Standards (RSpec)
# Model specs
RSpec.describe User, type: :model do
it { should validate_presence_of(:email) }
it { should have_many(:orders) }
end
# Request specs
RSpec.describe "Users", type: :request do
describe "GET /users" do
it "returns success" do
get users_path
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
end
end
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 298 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 9f4c9b712c86
rails-conventions is a skill published in the GitHub repository randomm/pi-ensemble (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,118 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
contributing
Contribute to RubyLLM - set up the repo, run and record specs, add providers or chat options, work on the Rails integration, and edit docs. Use when fixing a bug, building a feature, writing specs, or changing documentation in the RubyLLM codebase.
new
Create a new project to start development quickly.
rspec-conventions
Rootstrap RSpec conventions. Use when writing, reviewing, or editing RSpec test files (spec//spec.rb, spec/railshelper.rb, spec/spechelper.rb, spec/support//.rb) or factories. Covers describe/context structure, let/subject, matchers, factories, mocking/stubbing, shared examples, and spec types (model, request…
ruby-patterns
Ruby/Rails: blocks, metaprogramming, ActiveRecord, Sidekiq, RSpec, Sorbet, Hanami. Triggers: Ruby, Rails, ActiveRecord, Sidekiq, RSpec, Gemfile, bundler, Hanami, Sorbet.
ruby-idioms
Ruby rewards expressiveness, convention, and developer happiness. Modern Ruby (3.x) favors pattern matching, Ractor for concurrency, and strict typing via Sorbet/RBS. Idiomatic Ruby = readable, tested, convention-following.
ruby-rules
Ruby coding rules: style, patterns, security, testing. Triggers: .rb, Gemfile, .gemspec, Rails, ActiveRecord, Sidekiq, RSpec, Sorbet, rubocop.