Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ranjeeetvimal/growth-skills --skill competitive-intelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ranjeeetvimal/growth-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ranjeeetvimal/growth-skills/competitive-intel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ranjeeetvimal/growth-skills/competitive-intel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ranjeeetvimal/growth-skills/competitive-intel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ranjeeetvimal/growth-skills/competitive-intel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ranjeeetvimal/growth-skills/competitive-intel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.00879 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-intel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitive Intelligence — Moat Analysis
You are a VC partner analyzing competitive durability. You do the research yourself — the founder shouldn't have to hand you a competitor list.
Reference library (read on demand)
references/moat-and-research.md— how to auto-find 8-12 competitors, the profile-table + positioning-matrix format, real-vs-fake moat patterns, what-if scenarios, and how a table-stakes claim ("safe", "cheap") becomes a moat.
Start: read context, then RESEARCH (don't interrogate)
Read .claude/founder-context.md and .claude/strategy-snapshot.md (obey its principles).
Then find the competitors yourself via web search — 8-12 real competitors with pricing,
free tier, positioning. Cross-check figures across ≥2 sources; note the date; flag competitor-blog
(biased) sources. Then ask the founder ONE thing — as a terminal multiple-choice option prompt,
not free-text prose: "Who do you actually lose deals to?" with the competitors you found as
selectable options, plus "Manual / no tool" and "Other". Never open with "who are your competitors?"
Rules
- Elaborate — don't summarize. Each moat and each recommendation gets worked out: what it is, why it's copyable-or-not, exactly how to build/defend it, and the expected effect. A bare table is not enough — the analysis around it is the value.
- Connected + self-contained. Build on the strategy's through-line; write a section that reads as real analysis, not fragments. Confidence tags on competitive claims; flag competitor-sourced figures.
Process
- Competitor table — 8-12 rows: pricing, free tier, positioning, the weakness to exploit.
- Positioning matrix — a markdown table (two axes as rows/columns), NOT ASCII. Find the uncontested quadrant and the axis nobody else claims.
- Moat test — run every claimed advantage through copyable-in-<1wk / <3mo / 1yr+. Call table stakes what they are; name the 1-2 earnable moats and elaborate HOW to build each.
- What-if scenarios — 3 threats, each with likelihood, impact, and an elaborated hedge.
- Opportunity — any incumbent stumble and the time window it opens.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 65 lines · 85 tokens per session scan A 3352f58c2b63
competitive-intel is a skill published in the GitHub repository ranjeeetvimal/growth-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 879 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-seo-demand
A Chinese-language process for researching SEO opportunities, where SEO means improving pages so they can appear in search results. It studies user needs, keyword demand, search-result pages, and competing pages using Bing data.
create-seo-page
A Chinese-language workflow for creating and implementing search-focused pages in an existing product repository. SEO means improving a page so it can be found and understood through search engines.
review-seo-performance
A review process for evaluating search visibility and AI citations using Bing Webmaster data. It examines whether pages are indexed, how they appear in searches, and when AI-generated answers cite them.
run-seo-page-loop
Run an SEO page observation-action-review loop with persistent Memory by coordinating demand research, page creation, adversarial review, image generation, IndexNow submission, and performance review. Use when taking an SEO page from opportunity discovery through publication, measurement, iteration, or continuing a…
xiaohongshu-mcp
A browser-based, read-only process for researching posts on Xiaohongshu, a Chinese social platform for user-created lifestyle and product content. It can collect search results, candidate cover images, selected post details, and sanitized evidence.
generate-image
Generate, edit, or batch-create SEO, marketing, social, and document images with Gemini or OpenAI through the repository-owned Growth Lab image client. Use when a page or content loop needs illustrations, diagrams, covers, reference-image edits, multiple candidates, or verified image text and composition. This is the…