Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Ranvier-Technologies/pixir --skill skill-workflow-templategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ranvier-Technologies/pixirWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ranvier-technologies/pixir/skill-workflow-template)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ranvier-technologies/pixir/skill-workflow-template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ranvier-technologies/pixir/skill-workflow-template/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ranvier-technologies/pixir/skill-workflow-template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ranvier-technologies/pixir/skill-workflow-template.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00161 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
readonly-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read-Only Review
Use this Skill when the task needs a bounded read-only review with independent perspectives before synthesis.
For a structural Workflow version of this practice, inspect:
workflows/parallel_review.json
Then instantiate it through run_workflow with:
template_id:readonly-review/parallel_reviewtemplate_args.topic: the thing being reviewedtemplate_args.focus_a: the first explorer focustemplate_args.focus_b: the second explorer focus
The template requests read-only explorer steps and contains no scripted side effects. When using it as an example, inspect the instantiated workflow before execution.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 3416836d0f2c
readonly-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ranvier-Technologies/pixir (23 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 161 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
codegraph
Use the local CodeGraph CLI or an already configured MCP server to find symbols, callers, dependencies, and change impact in a repository. Use when the user names CodeGraph or repeated structural code exploration would benefit from a reusable index. Not for a simple text lookup, prose-only repositories, or automatic…
xp-code-review
Review pending changes for tests, maintainability, and project rules. Use when the user asks for code review, review pending changes, or alignment with maintainability and project rules.
fic-validate-plan
Validate that an implementation plan was executed correctly. Use when the user asks to verify completion, compare code changes to a plan, or produce a validation report.
repo-contracts-and-boundaries
Use when turning architecture, layering, ownership, dependency direction, schemas, structural metrics, quality thresholds, baselines, allowlists, or generated quality snapshots into repository checks.
elixir-review
Review Elixir/Phoenix code: OTP patterns, GenServer, LiveView, fault tolerance and concurrency.
improve-codebase-architecture
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.