Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas --skill framework-migration-legacy-modernizegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/framework-migration-legacy-modernize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/framework-migration-legacy-modernize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/framework-migration-legacy-modernize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/framework-migration-legacy-modernize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/framework-migration-legacy-modernize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.02029 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01014 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00406 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00203 |
Grade A, and why
framework-migration-legacy-modernize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to framework-migration-legacy-modernize — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Legacy Code Modernization Workflow
Orchestrate a comprehensive legacy system modernization using the strangler fig pattern, enabling gradual replacement of outdated components while maintaining continuous business operations through expert agent coordination.
[Extended thinking: The strangler fig pattern, named after the tropical fig tree that gradually envelops and replaces its host, represents the gold standard for risk-managed legacy modernization. This workflow implements a systematic approach where new functionality gradually replaces legacy components, allowing both systems to coexist during transition. By orchestrating specialized agents for assessment, testing, security, and implementation, we ensure each migration phase is validated before proceeding, minimizing disruption while maximizing modernization velocity.]
Use this skill when
- Working on legacy code modernization workflow tasks or workflows
- Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for legacy code modernization workflow
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to legacy code modernization workflow
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open
resources/implementation-playbook.md.
Phase 1: Legacy Assessment and Risk Analysis
1. Comprehensive Legacy System Analysis
- Use Task tool with subagent_type="legacy-modernizer"
- Prompt: "Analyze the legacy codebase at $ARGUMENTS. Document technical debt inventory including: outdated dependencies, deprecated APIs, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and architectural anti-patterns. Generate a modernization readiness report with component complexity scores (1-10), dependency mapping, and database coupling analysis. Identify quick wins vs complex refactoring targets."
- Expected output: Detailed assessment report with risk matrix and modernization priorities
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 136 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 30b5ebbe1576
framework-migration-legacy-modernize is a skill published in the GitHub repository ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas (8 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 2,029 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to framework-migration-legacy-modernize, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
sdd-apply
Skill "sdd-apply" from Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai, covering execution role, language domain contract, purpose, what you receive and execution and persistence contract.
openapi-codegen
OpenAPI client code generation. Covers openapi-typescript, openapi-generator-cli, swagger-typescript-api, and trpc-openapi. Use for generating type-safe API clients. USE WHEN: user mentions "OpenAPI codegen", "generate API client", "openapi-typescript", "swagger-typescript-api", "openapi-generator", asks about…
type-safe-api
End-to-end type safety patterns for API development. Covers Zod-to-OpenAPI, ts-rest, Zodios, and contract testing. Use for ensuring type consistency between backend and frontend. USE WHEN: user mentions "type-safe API", "end-to-end types", "Zod to OpenAPI", "ts-rest", "Zodios", "contract testing", asks about "share…
chi
Chi lightweight Go HTTP router. Covers routing, middleware, context, and patterns. Use for idiomatic, stdlib-compatible Go APIs. USE WHEN: user mentions "chi", "go-chi", "lightweight go router", "stdlib go router", asks about "chi middleware", "chi router", "chi context", "idiomatic go api", "net/http compatible…
spring-cloud-circuitbreaker
Resilience patterns with Spring Cloud Circuit Breaker and Resilience4j. Covers circuit breaker, retry, rate limiter, bulkhead, and fallback patterns. USE WHEN: user mentions "circuit breaker", "resilience4j", "fallback", "retry pattern", "rate limiter", "bulkhead", "fault tolerance Spring" DO NOT USE FOR: basic HTTP…
spring-rest
Spring REST Controller patterns. Covers ResponseEntity, exception handling, validation, HATEOAS, content negotiation, and async controllers. USE WHEN: user mentions "spring rest", "@RestController", "ResponseEntity", "REST API Spring", "exception handling Spring", "@ControllerAdvice" DO NOT USE FOR: GraphQL - use…