Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas --skill uncle-bob-craftgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/uncle-bob-craft)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/uncle-bob-craft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/uncle-bob-craft/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/uncle-bob-craft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/uncle-bob-craft.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.02410 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00964 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00482 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00241 |
Grade A, and why
uncle-bob-craft scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Uncle Bob Craft
Apply Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) criteria for code review and production: Clean Code, Clean Architecture, The Clean Coder, Clean Agile, and design-pattern discipline. This skill is complementary to the existing @clean-code skill (which focuses on the Clean Code book) and to your project's linter/formatter—it does not replace them.
Overview
This skill aggregates principles from Uncle Bob's body of work for reviewing and writing code: naming and functions (via @clean-code), architecture and boundaries (Clean Architecture), professionalism and estimation (The Clean Coder), agile values and practices (Clean Agile), and design-pattern use vs misuse. Use it to evaluate structure, dependencies, SOLID in context, code smells, and professional practices. It provides craft and design criteria only—not syntax or style enforcement, which remain the responsibility of your linter and formatter.
When to Use This Skill
- Code review: Apply Dependency Rule, boundaries, SOLID, and smell heuristics; suggest concrete refactors.
- Refactoring: Decide what to extract, where to draw boundaries, and whether a design pattern is justified.
- Architecture discussion: Check layer boundaries, dependency direction, and separation of concerns.
- Design patterns: Assess correct use vs cargo-cult or overuse before introducing a pattern.
- Estimation and professionalism: Apply Clean Coder ideas (saying no, sustainable pace, three-point estimates).
- Agile practices: Reference Clean Agile (Iron Cross, TDD, refactoring, pair programming) when discussing process.
- Do not use to replace or override the project's linter, formatter, or automated tests.
Aggregators by Source
| Source | Focus | Where to go |
|---|---|---|
| Clean Code | Names, functions, comments, formatting, tests, classes, smells | Use @clean-code for detail; this skill references it for review/production. |
| Clean Architecture | Dependency Rule, layers, boundaries, SOLID in architecture | See reference.md and references/clean-architecture.md. |
| The Clean Coder | Professionalism, estimation, saying no, sustainable pace | See reference.md and references/clean-coder.md. |
| Clean Agile | Values, Iron Cross, TDD, refactoring, pair programming | See reference.md and references/clean-agile.md. |
| Design patterns | When to use, misuse, cargo cult | See reference.md and references/design-patterns.md. |
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 165 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 79975227a9c5
uncle-bob-craft is a skill published in the GitHub repository ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas (12 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 2,410 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
brooks-harness
Maintenance orchestrator for the brooks-lint plugin itself. Runs a sequential subagent pipeline — author → eval → QA → trigger-audit → release — to add or edit a skill, refresh the eval suite, keep the four manifests + all README translations + CHANGELOG + AGENTS/GEMINI in sync, audit trigger boundaries, and cut…
release
Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG entry, validate, then commit, push, tag, and publish the GitHub release. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "release"…
brooks-audit
Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized…
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…
brooks-debt
Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what…
brooks-health
Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all…