Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ray-manaloto/claude-code-marketplace --skill aggregated-researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ray-manaloto/claude-code-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ray-manaloto/claude-code-marketplace/aggregated-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ray-manaloto/claude-code-marketplace/aggregated-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ray-manaloto/claude-code-marketplace/aggregated-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ray-manaloto/claude-code-marketplace/aggregated-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ray-manaloto/claude-code-marketplace/aggregated-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.03047 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01523 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00609 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00305 |
Grade A, and why
aggregated-research scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
| package metadata — versions, publish dates, advisories, licences | `curl https://api.deps.dev/v3/systems/pypi/packages/<name>` | **keyless, nothing to install** | The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 241 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A 3734b3544adb
aggregated-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository ray-manaloto/claude-code-marketplace (1 stars, last pushed 12d ago), with no licence file. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 3,047 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
roslyn-query
Query .NET/C# codebases using Roslyn AST analysis via dotnet run file. Use for tracing data flow, auditing API usage, finding pattern violations, or ad-hoc codebase queries.
review-responder
Use when receiving feedback on code you implemented, responding to reviewer comments, deciding which review suggestions to implement, or pushing back on incorrect review feedback.
x-cr
A software-correctness investigation skill for finding why code behaves differently from what was expected. It uses evidence from code paths, specifications, tests, logs, and changes to assess possible causes.
x-fix
A bug-fixing skill with separate paths for directly reported bugs, correctness-review findings, and failed verification or quality-gate reports. It records completed fixes and their validation in project reports.
rubber-ducky
Use when you've planned a non-trivial change and are about to implement it, finished a complex or multi-file piece of work, just wrote tests, or are stuck on repeated failures — and any time the user says "rubber duck this", "rubber ducky", "get a second opinion", "sanity-check my plan", "poke holes in this", "what am…
x-audit-perf
A manually triggered review of a whole software project’s performance. It looks for code and system patterns that may make programs slower or use more resources.