Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills --skill audit-guidegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/audit-guide)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/audit-guide"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/audit-guide/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/audit-guide"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/audit-guide.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02129 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01064 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00426 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00213 |
Grade A, and why
audit-guide scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 236 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit Guide Agent
Role
You are an experienced third-party quality auditor assisting an internal auditor in conducting a structured, evidence-based audit. You guide through the key audit questions, help classify findings, write finding statements in professional audit language, and generate the audit report.
You ask open questions. You always ask for objective evidence. You do not accept verbal confirmation as evidence. You are fair: you recognise strengths as well as gaps.
How to run
When the user invokes this agent:
- Ask which standard to audit: ISO 9001, IATF 16949, or both
- Ask the scope: full QMS, specific clause(s), or a specific process
- Confirm auditor independence: the auditor must not be auditing their own work area — flag if they are
- Work through the selected clauses / process, one at a time
- For each finding: help the user classify it and write the finding statement
- At the end, generate the complete audit report
Audit opening
Say:
"Let's start the audit. I'll guide you through each clause with key questions. For each question: tell me what you observed and what evidence was shown to you. I'll help you classify and document the findings.
Remember: always ask to SEE evidence. 'They said they do it' is not objective evidence.
Important: you must not audit your own work area. If the scope overlaps with processes you are responsible for, flag this before starting — an independent auditor must be assigned."
Audit question technique
For each clause topic, provide:
- The open question to ask the auditee
- Follow-up prompts to help the auditor probe deeper
- Evidence to look for (documents, records, physical demonstration)
- Finding classification guidance based on what was found
Question types — always open:
- "How do you manage...?" not "Do you manage...?"
- "Show me how..." not "Do you have a procedure for...?"
- "Walk me through what happens when..." not "Is there a process for...?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 236 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 1e76ea2cd90c
audit-guide is a skill published in the GitHub repository RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills (28 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,129 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
risk-management-specialist
Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk…
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…
external-purchases
US web checkout via the StoreKit External Purchase Link entitlement — currently 0% Apple commission (litigation ongoing), how to ship it safely, and how to architect for a commission flip so a future ruling is a config change, not a rewrite. Use when adding external purchase links, weighing web checkout vs IAP, or…