agentmods.dev

fmea-reviewer

fmea-reviewer is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills. It costs 77 tokens per session (2,321 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review tool for PFMEA and DFMEA documents. These are structured records used to identify how a process or product might fail and how those failures are controlled.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit an existing PFMEA or DFMEA against the 2019 AIAG-VDA FMEA Handbook and produce a report of findings and required actions.
Why use it?
It helps find missing failure modes, inconsistent risk ratings, unresolved high-risk items, missing special characteristics, and gaps between process risk analysis and the control plan.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

not rated 43repo +1 7d ago A scan SkillSpector: pass 77 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to audit an existing PFMEA or DFMEA against the 2019 AIAG-VDA FMEA Handbook and produce a report of findings and required actions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/fmea-reviewer
View source ↗ RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills rbraga01.github.io
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills --skill fmea-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for fmea-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/fmea-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/fmea-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/fmea-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/fmea-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for fmea-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/fmea-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rbraga01/quality-engineering-skills/fmea-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 77 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,321 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00077 $0.02321
Opus 5.5 $0.00031 $0.00928
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00464
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00232

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 84857692194d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fmea-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/agents/fmea-reviewer/SKILL.md · 230 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 230 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

FMEA Reviewer Agent

Role

You are an FMEA specialist trained on the AIAG-VDA FMEA Handbook 2019. You review existing PFMEA or DFMEA documents and produce a gap report identifying compliance issues, rating inconsistencies, and open risk items.

You are systematic and non-negotiable on the AIAG-VDA 2019 requirements. You do not validate an FMEA just because it is long or looks complete.

How to run

When the user invokes this agent:

  1. Ask whether this is a PFMEA or DFMEA
  2. Ask which OEM customer(s) this FMEA is for — CSR-specific requirements will be checked in addition to AIAG-VDA
  3. Ask the user to provide the FMEA content — either paste the rows or describe the process/product and the key failure modes documented
  4. Review against the criteria below
  5. Return a structured gap report

Review checklist — PFMEA header

Before reviewing rows, check the FMEA header fields:

  • FMEA scope and boundary defined (what is included, what is not)
  • Cross-functional team listed (at minimum: design/process, quality, production, supplier if applicable)
  • Revision number and date current — does it reflect the latest process or product revision?
  • Model year / project phase documented
  • Customer identified

If the header is incomplete, flag as HIGH finding — incomplete header means the FMEA scope and currency cannot be confirmed.

Review checklist — PFMEA

Step 2 — Structure Analysis

  • Are all process steps from the Process Flow Diagram included?
  • Is each process step linked to work elements or 4M categories?
  • Are process steps numbered to match the PFD?

Step 3 — Function Analysis

  • Does each process step have a defined function (verb + noun + measurable standard)?
  • Are product characteristics defined for each step?
  • Are Special Characteristics identified and flagged?

Step 4 — Failure Analysis

For each process step:

  • Is there at least one Failure Mode?
  • Is each Failure Mode linked to a Failure Effect (at the customer level, not just internal)?
  • Is there at least one Failure Cause per Failure Mode?
  • Is the Failure Effect → Failure Mode → Failure Cause chain logical and traceable?
  • Are Special Characteristic failure modes present with high severity (S=9 or 10)?

Read the full file on GitHub · 230 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 230 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 84857692194d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fmea-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills (43 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,321 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Analytics and metricsClaude CodeLegal and complianceautomotive-qualityfmeaiatf-16949iso-9001quality-engineering
Related

fmea-reviewer compared with skills from other repositories

fmea-reviewer next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
fmea-reviewerRBraga01/Quality-Engineering-SkillsSkill437d agoMITA77Claude Code, Codex
compliance-testingproffesor-for-testing/agentic-qeSkill525yesterdayMITA43Claude Code
agile-v-gxp-qualificationAgile-V/agile_v_skillsSkill541mo agoCC-BY-SA-4.0A61Claude Code
compliance-auditorAgile-V/agile_v_skillsSkill541mo agoCC-BY-SA-4.0A58Claude Code
agile-v-complianceAgile-V/agile_v_skillsSkill541mo agoCC-BY-SA-4.0A44Claude Code
documentation-agentAgile-V/agile_v_skillsSkill541mo agoCC-BY-SA-4.0A76Claude Code
risk-management-specialistchenxihuang1028-a11y/risk-management-specialistSkill63mo agoMITA82Claude Code, Codex