Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RealDealCPA-VR/Iron-Jarvis --skill researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RealDealCPA-VR/Iron-JarvisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/realdealcpa-vr/iron-jarvis/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/realdealcpa-vr/iron-jarvis/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/realdealcpa-vr/iron-jarvis/research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/realdealcpa-vr/iron-jarvis/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/realdealcpa-vr/iron-jarvis/research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00323 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00129 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 417907b5caee
research is a skill published in the GitHub repository RealDealCPA-VR/Iron-Jarvis (64 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 323 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
codeguard
A CodeGuard security skill that helps AI coding agents write secure code and prevent common vulnerabilities. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or modifying code to ensure secure-by-default practices are followed.
memory-safe-migration
Guide secure migration of code from memory-unsafe languages (C, C++, Assembly) to memory-safe languages (Rust, Go, Java, C#, Swift). Use when migrating or rewriting legacy C/C++ code, designing FFI boundaries between safe and unsafe code, writing new modules in existing C/C++ codebases, reviewing mixed-language…
CodeGuard MCP Meta Skill
Instructs AI coding agents to invoke CodeGuard MCP Server security rules before writing or reviewing code.
security-review
Comprehensive security code review workflow for a target repository, producing a markdown report with findings and recommendations.
chaos-fault-injection
Deliberately inject faults — dropped connections, corrupted writes, latency, malformed responses, resource exhaustion — and assert the system's expected recovery (escalation, hardstop, rollback).
pbt-strategy
Property-based testing with Python Hypothesis — find invariants, write @given strategies, and model stateful systems with RuleBasedStateMachine.