Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rebel0789/Memory-Recall --skill security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rebel0789/Memory-RecallWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rebel0789/memory-recall/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rebel0789/memory-recall/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rebel0789/memory-recall/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rebel0789/memory-recall/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rebel0789/memory-recall/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00106 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00042 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Security Review
Purpose
Review trust boundaries, capabilities, and data exposure.
Procedure
- Map assets, actors, boundaries, capabilities, and data classes.
- Review validation, scope, secrets, egress, sandbox, approval, idempotency, and logs.
- Add adversarial tests and stop on critical uncertainty.
Completion
Return evidence, files changed when applicable, exact checks, risks, limitations, rollback, and safest next step. The skill never grants a tool or broadens policy.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 16 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A dd254a37abd7
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository rebel0789/Memory-Recall (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 106 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
env-doctor
Diagnose the local dev machine before any APC loop step — run apc env doctor, classify each failure into a fault domain, apc env up to auto-fix what is safe, then fingerprint. Keeps env faults out of SUT verdicts.
observability
Periodic health sweep of the running system via the debug pipeline (cloud logs / k8s / daemon / DB slices). On a real anomaly, open a bug task (--kind workitem) carrying the evidence refs so it re-enters the bugfix loop. A healthy sweep opens NO task — never fabricate a bug.
release-ota-promote
Publish signed Electron UI/daemon bundles to a local OTA feed with atomic manifest switch and digest readback, while dry-running the K8s drainrespawn rollout. Prod is refused before writes; feed publication is not client apply.
test-result-feedback
Close the acceptance loop for a tested change — consume the apc test TierResult, map EACH acceptance criterion to a pass/fail outcome from structured fields (never chat text), attach an evidence ref, and write it back to the task. A SUT red is a finding, never softened to green.
ui-align
Visual-alignment workflow for a new UI need or a UI改进. Index-first (consult the ui-kit registry to avoid re-building an existing primitive), then implement, then run the screenshot harness to capture the component in light/dark against the live /ui-kit, then produce a ReportCard (screenshot assets side by side + a…
persona-generator
Given a Council Brief, produce persona-ROLE instance definitions: real, publicly-verifiable people who occupy distinct stakeholder positions on the issue — each a persona-flavored role template (lens / voice / SOUL + the persona-skill capability boundary + icon + an ASCII usernameSlug), handed to convene…