threat-model-analyze

threat-model-analyze is a skill for Claude Code from RedHatProductSecurity/agentic-threat-modeling. It costs 52 tokens per session (3,473 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A security analysis tool that examines a system description to identify threats, estimate their risk, and connect them to possible attackers. It can use established methods such as STRIDE, PASTA, LINDDUN, VAST, attack trees, and OCTAVE.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to analyze a system at quick, standard, or deep detail, choose one or more threat-analysis methods, and focus on selected or automatically chosen attacker types.
Why use it?
It gives a structured way to look for security problems across system parts, data flows, trust boundaries, and entry points.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to analyze a system at quick, standard, or deep detail, choose one or more threat-analysis methods, and focus on selected or automatically chosen attacker types.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/redhatproductsecurity/agentic-threat-modeling/threat-model-analyze
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add RedHatProductSecurity/agentic-threat-modeling --skill threat-model-analyze
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RedHatProductSecurity/agentic-threat-modeling

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for threat-model-analyze

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/redhatproductsecurity/agentic-threat-modeling/threat-model-analyze/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/redhatproductsecurity/agentic-threat-modeling/threat-model-analyze)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/redhatproductsecurity/agentic-threat-modeling/threat-model-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/redhatproductsecurity/agentic-threat-modeling/threat-model-analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for threat-model-analyze

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/redhatproductsecurity/agentic-threat-modeling/threat-model-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/redhatproductsecurity/agentic-threat-modeling/threat-model-analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,473 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.03473
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.01736
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00695
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00347

Measured 9d ago against content hash 7a0a677e489b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

threat-model-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

module/skills/threat-model-analyze/SKILL.md · 256 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Threat Analysis Engine

You are performing the analysis phase of threat modeling. You receive a system context (from the discover phase) and apply the specified framework(s) to identify threats, assess risk, and map to threat actors.

Inputs

  1. System context — the structured profile from the discover phase (components, data flows, trust boundaries, assets, entry points)
  2. Framework(s) — which framework(s) to apply (default: STRIDE)
  3. Actor personas — specific actors to focus on, or "auto" for automatic selection (default: auto)
  4. Depth — quick (surface-level), standard (thorough), or deep (exhaustive with attack trees for top threats)

Analysis Workflow

Step 1: Load Framework Reference

Read the appropriate framework reference file(s) from ./reference/:

  • ./reference/stride.md for STRIDE
  • ./reference/pasta.md for PASTA
  • ./reference/linddun.md for LINDDUN
  • ./reference/vast.md for VAST
  • ./reference/attack-trees.md for Attack Trees
  • ./reference/octave.md for OCTAVE

Always also load ./reference/threat-actors.md for actor profiling.

Step 2: Select Threat Actors

If actors are set to "auto", analyze the system context to suggest relevant actors:

  1. Examine data stored: Map data types to actor profiles using the heuristics in threat-actors.md
  2. Examine system exposure: Internet-facing vs. internal, user base, industry
  3. Examine technology stack: Dependency footprint, cloud vs. on-prem, legacy vs. modern
  4. Examine compliance context: Regulatory requirements signal which actors are relevant

Select the 2-4 most relevant actors and document why each was selected. Be specific — "organized crime is relevant because this system stores 2M customer payment card details" not just "organized crime could target this system."

If specific actors were requested, use those but still explain why they're relevant (or note if they seem unlikely for this system).

Step 3: Apply the Framework

Follow the methodology defined in the framework reference file. Use the data classification table from the discovery phase to calibrate threat severity — a SQL injection against a Restricted-classified data store (credentials, encryption keys) is Critical impact, while the same vulnerability against a Public-classified store (marketing content) is Low impact. Reference the data classification in threat narratives to justify impact ratings.

Read the full file on GitHub · 256 lines

Files

What ships with it

7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 256 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7a0a677e489b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

threat-model-analyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository RedHatProductSecurity/agentic-threat-modeling (4 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 3,473 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens