Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/redhuntlabs/wizard/making-a-decisionnpx skills add redhuntlabs/wizard --skill making-a-decisiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/redhuntlabs/wizardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/redhuntlabs/wizard/making-a-decision)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/redhuntlabs/wizard/making-a-decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/redhuntlabs/wizard/making-a-decision.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00935 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00467 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
making-a-decision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Making a Decision
What this does
Produces a written decision with the criteria, the options scored, the recommendation, the runner-up, and the reason the runner-up lost. Documents what would change your mind.
When to use
- Picking between two or more concrete options
- Documenting a decision so future-you (or your team) remembers why
- Closing out a comparison that's been dragging
- Any decision worth more than 30 minutes of consideration
What you bring (Inputs)
- The decision (one sentence: "should I X or Y")
- The criteria that matter (3-5)
- The options under consideration (2+)
What you get (Output)
A written decision document: criteria + scoring + recommendation + alternative + reversal trigger.
How it works (Steps)
This is a workflow.
Stages
Stage 1: State the decision
In one sentence. ("Should I X or Y.")
Stage 2: List the criteria
3-5 criteria, weighted (numeric or simple high/med/low).
Stage 3: Score each option
Score every option against every criterion. A 3-option, 4-criterion grid is enough.
Stage 4: Pick the winner
Based on the score, name the winner.
Stage 5: Name the strongest runner-up
Explicitly name the second-best option.
Stage 6: Reject the runner-up explicitly
State: "I considered [runner-up] and rejected it because [reason]." The reason must be specific (cite criteria, not "it wasn't as good").
Stage 7: State the reversal trigger
"I would change my mind if [concrete event or metric]." The trigger must be observable.
Checkpoints
- After Stage 2: at least 3 criteria
- After Stage 3: every option scored against every criterion
- After Stage 6: rejection reason cites specific criteria
- After Stage 7: reversal trigger is concrete (metric, date, or observation)
Loop-back conditions
- If Stage 3 reveals a missing criterion, return to Stage 2 and add it
- If Stage 6 cannot produce a real reason, the decision is not ready — the winner and runner-up may be too close; add a tiebreaker criterion in Stage 2
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 118 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A a8f7167ece12
making-a-decision is a skill published in the GitHub repository redhuntlabs/wizard (9 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 935 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fastapi
FastAPI - 高性能 Python Web API 框架.
fzf
Skill "fzf" from CN-big-cabbage/github-skill-distiller, covering fzf 通用命令行模糊查找器, 技能概述, 使用流程, 关键章节导航 and ai 助手能力.
glances
Skill "glances" from CN-big-cabbage/github-skill-distiller, covering glances 跨平台系统监控工具, 技能概述, 使用流程, 关键章节导航 and ai 助手能力.
lazydocker
本技能帮助用户通过 lazydocker 的终端 UI 界面管理 Docker 容器、镜像、卷和网络，支持以下场景：.
paper-checking
论文查重系统 - 一亿字次级论文库秒级查重，支持纵向查重和横向查重.
you-get
网页媒体下载助手 - 从YouTube、Bilibili等网站下载视频、音频、图片.