Lenny Skills is a collection of product-management and engineering workflows for Claude Code and other AI agents, covering areas such as strategy, research, planning, shipping, growth, and hiring. Each skill gives an agent specialized guidance, frameworks, checklists, or templates for product work, and the catalogue contains many of these skills.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RefoundAI/lenny-skills --skill stakeholder-alignmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RefoundAI/lenny-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/refoundai/lenny-skills/stakeholder-alignment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/refoundai/lenny-skills/stakeholder-alignment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/refoundai/lenny-skills/stakeholder-alignment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/refoundai/lenny-skills/stakeholder-alignment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/refoundai/lenny-skills/stakeholder-alignment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01505 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00753 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00301 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00151 |
Grade A, and why
stakeholder-alignment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Stakeholder Alignment
Drive cross-functional momentum by mapping incentives and co-creating solutions
Help the user with stakeholder alignment using insights from 30 guests and posts across Lenny's Podcast and Newsletter.
How to Help
- Incentive Mapping - Guidance on how to identify the goals, fears, and OKRs of key stakeholders to tailor your messaging.
- Conflict Neutralization - Practical scripts and mindset shifts for moving from defensive pushback to collaborative discovery.
- Co-creation Strategy - Frameworks for involving partners early in the design process to ensure they feel like authors rather than reviewers.
- Communication Standardization - Methods for creating a single source of truth that prevents information drift across functions.
Core Principles
Adopt an Improv Mindset
Adam Grenier: "If you approach it with that 'Yes, and...', it's often still true. It's like, oh, both of these things can be true at once. You could have a different goal than I have, or you have a system problem local to you that is important to you and it's not important to me."
Use the Yes and technique to validate a collaborator perspective before adding your own constraints. This allows competing priorities to coexist without stalling progress or damaging the rapport between teams.
Assume Information Gaps
Ami Vora: "It means that every meeting you walk into, you're probably not going to get bored and I get bored a lot, but if you assume that every person there knows something that you don't know, then it's not just wait to get to the right answer, it's like, discover the thing that they know that you don't know and it becomes just a little bit of uncovering."
Approach disagreements by assuming your colleague possesses unique information that you lack. Transform potential conflict into a discovery process by responding to opposing opinions with curiosity rather than defense.
Build a Bridge of Connection
Dr. Becky Kennedy: "He kind of joins my world where I'm embedded in my own priorities and by doing that forms a bridge, that's what connection is. So I can kind of walk back over to his world with him to do something that's a priority in his world."
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 89 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A e4316cc908a3
stakeholder-alignment is a skill published in the GitHub repository RefoundAI/lenny-skills (1,321 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,505 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
linear
Manage Linear issues, projects, and teams via the GraphQL API. Create, update, search, and organize issues. Uses API key auth (no OAuth needed). All operations via curl — no dependencies.
notion
Notion API for creating and managing pages, databases, and blocks via curl. Search, create, update, and query Notion workspaces directly from the terminal.
github-issues
Create, manage, triage, and close GitHub issues. Search existing issues, add labels, assign people, and link to PRs. Works with gh CLI or falls back to git + GitHub REST API via curl.
trello
Manage Trello boards, lists, and cards via the Trello REST API.
things-mac
Manage Things 3 via the things CLI on macOS (add/update projects+todos via URL scheme; read/search/list from the local Things database). Use when a user asks OpenClaw to add a task to Things, list inbox/today/upcoming, search tasks, or inspect projects/areas/tags.
wayfinder
Plan a huge chunk of work — more than one agent session can hold — as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.