opinion-workflow

An internal workflow for an opinion command that asks several selected expert agents for recommendations, combines their scores, and returns a final result.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare options through several expert-agent opinions, rank recommendations, identify consensus, and summarize risks and confidence.
Why use it?
It keeps the individual expert discussions out of the main conversation while preserving an aggregated recommendation. The workflow also handles disagreement and cases where no opinions are available.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the lets plugin — 13 skills, 22 commands, 15 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion-workflow
Any agent
npx skills add restarter/lets-workflow --skill opinion-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/restarter/lets-workflow

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install lets, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 13 skills, 22 commands, 15 agents.

Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,110 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00057 $0.01110
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.00555
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00222
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00111

Measured 3d ago against content hash 45d10deb00ed, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

opinion-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (opinion.workflow.js), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/lets/skills/opinion-workflow/SKILL.md · 47 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 47 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

opinion-workflow (Dynamic Workflow asset)

A Dynamic Workflow asset (see CLAUDE.md -> "Dynamic Workflow Assets"; review-workflow is the reference example). opinion.workflow.js is executed by the Workflow tool, invoked from /lets:opinion's Workflow Mode via:

Workflow({ scriptPath: "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/opinion-workflow/opinion.workflow.js", args })

${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} is substituted at command-load time, so opinion.md carries the literal absolute path. Treat opinion.workflow.js as a template the command points at, not a script to reproduce inline.

What it does (off-context)

A multi-stage chain so per-agent opinions never enter the conversation - only the final aggregate returns:

  1. Opine - fan out the selected lets:<name> experts in parallel (structured OPINION_SCHEMA: per-option scores 1-5, recommended option, risks, confidence, reasoning).
  2. Tally (pure logic) - aggregate -> options ranked by recommendation plurality (average score is only a tiebreak), so leading = the most-recommended option (the same axis unanimous/weakConsensus use). Zero opinions -> no leading (recommendation surfaces as null, never a phantom first option). The option-id allowlist also feeds OPINION_SCHEMA/CHALLENGE_SCHEMA as a runtime enum, so agents can only emit valid ids.
  3. Challenge (CONDITIONAL) - runs ONLY when weakConsensus (not unanimous, or any low-confidence vote). Re-dispatch the same experts to argue the strongest case AGAINST the leading option (CHALLENGE_SCHEMA). Strong consensus -> skipped.
  4. Synthesize - decideRecommendation applies the asymmetric rule: a strong adversarial signal (majority would_change_pick at high severity converging on one better option - convergence judged over the high-severity votes only, against real option ids so a hallucinated id can't win) flips the pick; otherwise the leading option is confirmed with the strongest counter attached as a caveat. If the challenge was dispatched but every critic errored (zero usable votes), outcome is challenge_failed (the analog of review's verify_failed) - the leading option is surfaced as NOT stress-tested, never silently confirmed.

Read the full file on GitHub · 47 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 47 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 45d10deb00ed

Subscribe to this mod's changes

opinion-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository restarter/lets-workflow (17 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,110 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens